CVE-2024-52918
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBitcoin-Qt in Bitcoin Core before 0.20.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and application crash) via a BIP21 r parameter for a URL that has a large file.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBitcoin-Qt (the Bitcoin Core GUI) before version 0.20.0 does not limit memory allocation when processing BIP21 payment request URIs. When a BIP21 URI containing an 'r' parameter (payment request URL) is opened, the application attempts to load the entire remote file into memory without size restrictions, allowing attackers to trigger memory exhaustion and crash the application.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Bitcoin Core versionRun 'bitcoin-cli getinfo' or 'bitcoin-cli getnetworkinfo' and look for the 'version' field. On Windows, check Properties of bitcoin-qt.exe. On Linux, run 'bitcoind --version'.Affected if Version is below 0.20.0 (for example, 0.19.x, 0.18.x, or earlier)
-
Confirm Bitcoin-Qt GUI is in useVerify that the bitcoin-qt executable (the GUI wrapper) is installed, not just the headless bitcoind daemon. Look for bitcoin-qt in your installed programs or running processes.Affected if Bitcoin-Qt GUI is installed and used, as the vulnerability is in the GUI's URI handling (bitcoind alone may not process BIP21 URIs)
-
Identify BIP21 URI usage patternsReview logs or audit any systems where users can click or open bitcoin: URIs with an 'r' parameter (for example, bitcoin:1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa?r=https://malicious.site/payment.request)Affected if Users open BIP21 URIs containing an 'r' parameter pointing to remote payment request URLs
You are affected if Bitcoin-Qt version is below 0.20.0 and the GUI is used to open BIP21 URIs with an 'r' parameter, as the application will attempt to load the entire remote file into memory without size limits.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Bitcoin Core 0.20.0 or later, which implements proper memory limits or streaming for BIP21 r parameter handling. As a temporary mitigation, avoid opening untrusted BIP21 URIs from unknown sources.
Bitcoin Core 0.20.0 or later
- 1. Backup your Bitcoin Core data directory and wallet files before proceeding
- 2. Download Bitcoin Core version 0.20.0 or later from the official source at bitcoincore.org
- 3. Verify the GPG signature of the downloaded binary using the release signing keys
- 4. Close Bitcoin-Qt if it is currently running
- 5. Install or replace the Bitcoin Core installation with the new version
- 6. Start Bitcoin-Qt and verify the application runs without memory issues
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-52918 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-52918 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data