Bitcoin CoreApplication · Bitcoin

CVE-2024-52919

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-11-18
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 22.0 or later.
See remediation →
70/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Bitcoin Core before 22.0 has a CAddrMan nIdCount integer overflow and resultant assertion failure (and daemon exit) via a flood of addr messages.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Bitcoin Core before v22.0 contains an integer overflow vulnerability in the CAddrMan address manager component. The nIdCount variable can overflow when the node receives a flood of addr messages, triggering an assertion failure that causes the daemon to exit unexpectedly.

MitigationUpgrade Bitcoin Core to version 22.0 or later, which contains the fix for the nIdCount integer overflow in CAddrMan.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Bitcoin CoreApplication
Affected:< 22.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Bitcoin Core is installed
    Run `bitcoind --version` or `bitcoin-cli --version` to confirm the software is present on the system
    Affected if The command fails or returns an error indicating Bitcoin Core is not installed
  2. Determine the installed Bitcoin Core version
    Execute `bitcoind --version` (or `bitcoin-daemon --version` depending on installation) and note the version number in the output
    Affected if The version returned is a release earlier than v22.0 (for example, v21.0, v0.21.x, or any release in the v0.x - v21.x series)
  3. Confirm the daemon is configured to accept incoming connections
    Check the configuration file (bitcoin.conf) or running process for settings that enable `listen=1` or allow inbound peer connections
    Affected if Inbound connections are enabled, as this allows external addr messages to reach the node and trigger the overflow condition
  4. Verify the CAddrMan component is active
    Confirm the node is operational and has network functionality enabled; the addr manager is active by default in normal operation
    Affected if The Bitcoin Core daemon is running with default network settings, as the vulnerability lies in the standard addr message processing path

The environment is affected if the installed Bitcoin Core version is any release earlier than v22.0 and the node is operating with default network settings that allow addr message processing.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 22.0 or later
Fixed in 22.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Bitcoin Core to version 22.0 or later, which contains the fix for the nIdCount integer overflow in CAddrMan.

Recommended fix High confidence

Bitcoin Core 22.0 or later

  1. 1. Back up your Bitcoin Core wallet and blockchain data before upgrading.
  2. 2. Download Bitcoin Core version 22.0 or later from the official Bitcoin Core website (bitcoincore.org).
  3. 3. Verify the downloaded binaries using the provided SHA256 checksums and GPG signatures.
  4. 4. Stop the running Bitcoin Core daemon (bitcoind) cleanly using 'bitcoin-cli stop'.
  5. 5. Install the new version, replacing the previous binaries.
  6. 6. Start the Bitcoin Core daemon and verify it is running without assertion failures.
Caveat Review release notes for any backward-incompatible changes before upgrading

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Bitcoin Core Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,880
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-52919 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-52919 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data