CVE-2024-52962
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Output Neutralization for Logs vulnerability [CWE-117] in FortiAnalyzer version 7.6.1 and below, version 7.4.5 and below, version 7.2.8 and below, version 7.0.13 and below and FortiManager version 7.6.1 and below, version 7.4.5 and below, version 7.2.8 and below, version 7.0.12 and below may allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to pollute the logs via crafted login requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a log injection vulnerability (CWE-117) in FortiAnalyzer and FortiManager where unauthenticated remote attackers can pollute logs by sending crafted login requests. The lack of proper output neutralization allows malicious input to be written directly into log files, potentially enabling log poisoning attacks or obscuring forensic evidence.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.14>= 7.2.0, < 7.2.9>= 7.4.0, < 7.4.6>= 7.6.0, < 7.6.2>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.14>= 7.2.0, < 7.2.9>= 7.4.0, < 7.4.6>= 7.6.0, < 7.6.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed productRun 'get system status' in the FortiAnalyzer/FortiManager CLI or check the web UI dashboard to confirm whether you are running FortiAnalyzer or FortiManagerAffected if The product is FortiAnalyzer or FortiManager
-
Check the installed versionRun 'get system status' in the CLI and locate the 'FortiAnalyzer/FortiManager version' field, or view the version displayed on the web UI login page or dashboardAffected if The version displayed matches any of the following ranges: 7.0.0 through 7.0.13, 7.2.0 through 7.2.8, 7.4.0 through 7.4.5, or 7.6.0 through 7.6.1
-
Confirm the build numberRun 'get system status' and note the 'Build' number shown in the outputAffected if The build number corresponds to an affected version within the ranges listed above
You are affected if your FortiAnalyzer or FortiManager version falls within 7.0.0-7.0.13, 7.2.0-7.2.8, 7.4.0-7.4.5, or 7.6.0-7.6.1, regardless of build number within those ranges.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.0.147.2.97.4.6
Apply the vendor-supplied patches for FortiAnalyzer and FortiManager to upgrade to fixed versions. Upgrade to FortiAnalyzer 7.6.2+, 7.4.6+, 7.2.9+, 7.0.14+ and FortiManager 7.6.2+, 7.4.6+, 7.2.9+, 7.0.13+ as appropriate.
FortiManager/FortiAnalyzer: Upgrade to 7.0.14, 7.2.9, 7.4.6, or 7.6.2 (or later stable releases within your major version branch)
- 1. Identify the current FortiManager/FortiAnalyzer firmware version by navigating to System Settings > Firmware or using 'get system status' CLI command.
- 2. Review the Fortinet release notes for the target fixed version (7.0.14, 7.2.9, 7.4.6, or 7.6.2) to confirm compatibility with your deployment model.
- 3. Create a full backup of the FortiManager/FortiAnalyzer configuration using the GUI (System Settings > Backup) or CLI 'execute backup full-config' command.
- 4. Download the appropriate firmware image from Fortinet Support portal (https://support.fortinet.com/).
- 5. Upload the firmware image via GUI (System Settings > Firmware > Upload) or CLI 'execute system firmware upgrade' command.
- 6. Reboot the device and verify all services are operational after upgrade.
- 7. Validate that log entries are properly sanitized and no log injection occurs with the fixed version.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-52962 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-52962 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data