CVE-2024-52968
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn improper authentication in Fortinet FortiClientMac 7.0.11 through 7.2.4 allows attacker to gain improper access to MacOS via empty password.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFortiClientMac versions 7.0.11 through 7.2.4 contain an improper authentication vulnerability that allows attackers to gain unauthorized access to MacOS systems by authenticating with an empty password. This authentication bypass occurs due to insufficient validation of credentials during the login process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.0.11, < 7.0.13>= 7.2.3, < 7.2.5= 7.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify FortiClientMac is installedOpen Terminal and run: ls /Applications/ | grep -i forticlient OR system_profiler SPApplicationsDataType | grep -i forticlientAffected if FortiClientMac does not appear in Applications, then the system is not affected by this CVE.
-
Identify the installed FortiClientMac versionRun: /Applications/FortiClient.app/Contents/Info.plist or right-click FortiClient.app > Get Info to view the version number. Alternatively, run: defaults read /Applications/FortiClient.app/Contents/Info CFBundleShortVersionStringAffected if The displayed version falls within an affected range: 7.0.11 to 7.0.12, 7.2.3 to 7.2.4, or exactly 7.4.0.
-
Confirm FortiClient authentication feature is in useCheck if FortiClient is configured for VPN, Endpoint Protection, or EMS connection that requires user authentication. Review FortiClient settings or check for active profiles: defaults read /Library/Preferences/com.fortinet.forticlient 2>/dev/nullAffected if FortiClient is installed with authentication-enabled features (VPN, endpoint protection, EMS) on an affected version - the empty password bypass applies to the login process.
-
Test for empty password acceptanceThis step requires controlled testing in a non-production environment. Attempt authentication with an empty password field through FortiClient login UI or API if exposed. Document whether authentication succeeds without credentials.Affected if Authentication succeeds with an empty password on an affected version, confirming the vulnerability is present and exploitable.
A user is affected if FortiClientMac is installed at versions 7.0.11-7.0.12, 7.2.3-7.2.4, or 7.4.0 AND the authentication feature is enabled/configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.0.137.2.5
Update FortiClientMac to the latest version (beyond 7.2.4) to remediate this vulnerability. Until patched, ensure strong password policies are enforced and consider disabling the product if immediate patching is not feasible.
FortiClientMac 7.0.13+, 7.2.5+, or 7.4.1+ (depending on your current branch)
- 1. Identify the currently installed FortiClientMac version by checking About FortiClient in the application menu
- 2. For FortiClientMac 7.0.x users: Upgrade to version 7.0.13 or later
- 3. For FortiClientMac 7.2.x users: Upgrade to version 7.2.5 or later
- 4. For FortiClientMac 7.4.0 users: Upgrade to version 7.4.1 or later
- 5. Obtain the update from the official Fortinet support portal or FortiClient download center at https://www.fortinet.com/support/contact-support
- 6. Verify the installation completed successfully and confirm the version number after upgrading
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-52968 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-52968 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data