CVE-2024-5313
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCWE-668: Exposure of the Resource Wrong Sphere vulnerability exists that exposes a SSH interface over the product network interface. This does not allow to directly exploit the product or make any unintended operation as the SSH interface access is protected by an authentication mechanism. Impacts are limited to port scanning and fingerprinting activities as well as attempts to perform a potential denial of service attack on the exposed SSH interface.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCWE-668 vulnerability exposes an SSH service on the product network interface instead of restricting it to a management network. While SSH access is protected by authentication, the exposure enables reconnaissance activities like port scanning and fingerprinting, plus potential denial-of-service attacks against the SSH service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.0.3.8.2_128= 2.0.4.1.2_131CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device firmware versionAccess the device management interface or check system information to determine the installed firmware version. Compare against affected versions 2.0.3.8.2_128 and 2.0.4.1.2_131.Affected if Firmware version matches exactly 2.0.3.8.2_128 or 2.0.4.1.2_131
-
Confirm SSH service is enabledAttempt to connect to port 22/tcp on the device from the product network segment using an SSH client or port scanner.Affected if SSH port 22 responds to connection attempts from the product network
-
Determine SSH bind address configurationIf management access is available, examine the SSH daemon configuration files or running processes to identify which network interface SSH is bound to (e.g., check for 'ListenAddress' in sshd_config or similar).Affected if SSH is bound to all interfaces (0.0.0.0) or to an IP address on the product network segment rather than only a management interface
-
Verify network access restrictionsFrom a host on the product network segment, attempt to reach port 22 on the device and confirm whether firewall rules or network segmentation block or permit this traffic.Affected if SSH traffic from product network segment reaches the device without being blocked by firewall or ACL rules
Device is affected if it runs firmware version 2.0.3.8.2_128 or 2.0.4.1.2_131 AND SSH port 22 is accessible from the product network rather than restricted to a management-only interface.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict SSH daemon to bind only to management/internal network interfaces, or implement firewall rules to block SSH access from the product network segment.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-5313 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-5313 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data