CVE-2024-5315
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVulnerabilities in Dolibarr ERP - CRM that affect version 9.0.1 and allow SQL injection. These vulnerabilities could allow a remote attacker to send a specially crafted SQL query to the system and retrieve all the information stored in the database through the parameters viewstatut in /dolibarr/commande/list.php.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Dolibarr ERP-CRM version 9.0.1 allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via the unescaped viewstatut parameter in /dolibarr/commande/list.php, potentially enabling complete database exfiltration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Dolibarr installationCheck for the presence of /dolibarr/commande/list.php file in the web root directoryAffected if The file exists in the web-accessible directory
-
Confirm Dolibarr versionLocate and read the version file (typically version.php or DoliBarrector in the Dolibarr root directory) to determine the installed version numberAffected if The installed version is exactly 9.0.1
-
Verify vulnerable parameter handlingExamine the list.php file around line handling the 'viewstatut' parameter; look for direct use of $_GET['viewstatut'] or $_POST['viewstatut'] in SQL queries without escaping or parameterizationAffected if The code uses the viewstatut parameter directly in SQL queries without sanitization functions like htmlspecialchars, intval, or prepared statements
-
Test parameter susceptibility (if authorized)Send a crafted request to /dolibarr/commande/list.php with viewstatut=1' (note the apostrophe) and observe if SQL errors are returned or unexpected behavior occursAffected if The application returns SQL syntax errors or behaves unexpectedly when the parameter contains SQL metacharacters
A system is affected if Dolibarr version 9.0.1 is installed AND the viewstatut parameter in /dolibarr/commande/list.php is used in SQL queries without input sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied patch immediately; if unavailable, implement input validation and parameterized queries for the viewstatut parameter, or temporarily disable the order listing functionality as a compensating control.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-5315 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-5315 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data