CVE-2024-53544
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNovaCHRON Zeitsysteme GmbH & Co. KG Smart Time Plus v8.x to v8.6 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability via the getCookieNames method in the smarttimeplus/MySQLConnection endpoint.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the getCookieNames method of the smarttimeplus/MySQLConnection endpoint in NovaCHRON Smart Time Plus v8.x through v8.6 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via the cookie name parameter.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify NovaCHRON Smart Time Plus installationLocate the NovaCHRON Smart Time Plus application installation directory or check running services for 'smarttimeplus' or 'NovaCHRON' processesAffected if The software is installed on the system
-
Determine installed versionCheck the application's version information (typically found in about dialog, version file, or installation metadata) and compare against the affected range v8.x through v8.6Affected if Installed version is v8.x through v8.6 inclusive
-
Verify MySQLConnection endpoint exposureCheck if the smarttimeplus/MySQLConnection endpoint is accessible on the application server (typically via HTTP/HTTPS access to the web interface)Affected if The MySQLConnection endpoint is externally or internally accessible
-
Confirm MySQL database configurationInspect the application's database configuration to verify it uses MySQL as the backend databaseAffected if The application is configured to connect to a MySQL database
The environment is affected if NovaCHRON Smart Time Plus v8.x through v8.6 is installed, the smarttimeplus/MySQLConnection endpoint is accessible, and the application uses MySQL as its backend database.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to version beyond v8.6 once available, or apply vendor-supplied patch; implement parameterized queries and input validation as immediate compensating controls.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-53544 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-53544 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data