CVE-2024-53711
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in tranchesdunet Hotlink2Watermark hotlink2watermark allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Hotlink2Watermark: from n/a through <= 0.3.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCSRF vulnerability in Hotlink2Watermark plugin enables attackers to craft malicious requests that inject persistent XSS payloads into the application. When authenticated users unknowingly submit attacker-controlled requests, the malicious script gets stored and executes in browsers of users viewing the affected content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate Hotlink2Watermark plugin and identify versionAccess your CMS plugin directory or admin panel, find Hotlink2Watermark, and record the installed version number displayed in the plugin metadataAffected if The plugin is installed and the version falls within the vulnerable range or is unknown/unpatched
-
Verify plugin is activeCheck the plugins list in your CMS admin panel to confirm Hotlink2Watermark is currently enabled and runningAffected if Plugin status shows as active and the version is vulnerable
-
Inspect plugin configuration for suspicious stored contentNavigate to plugin settings pages, examine any fields that accept URL or watermark parameters, and search database tables associated with this plugin for unexpected script tags, JavaScript URLs, or encoded payloadsAffected if Any stored settings or database entries contain script tags, event handlers, or javascript: protocols indicating injected XSS code
-
Review recent plugin-related request logsExamine server access logs and CMS audit logs for POST requests to Hotlink2Watermark endpoints that contain XSS payloads in parametersAffected if Logs show recent requests with malicious script content targeting the plugin from any IP including internal networks
You are affected if Hotlink2Watermark plugin is installed, active, and contains any stored XSS payloads or if your version lacks the anti-CSRF token implementation required to prevent cross-site request forgery attacks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens for all state-changing operations and sanitize all user-supplied input before storage and output to prevent stored XSS execution.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-53711 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-53711 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data