CVE-2024-53723
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in acbaltaci Google Plus Share and +1 Button google-plus-share-and-plusone-button allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Google Plus Share and +1 Button: from n/a through <= 1.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCSRF vulnerability in the Google Plus Share and +1 Button WordPress plugin (versions <=1.0) allows authenticated attackers to inject malicious JavaScript code through stored XSS by tricking administrators into visiting crafted links. The plugin lacks proper anti-CSRF token validation, enabling attackers to silently modify plugin settings and inject persistent malicious scripts.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify plugin is installedIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'Google Plus Share and +1 Button' or search for any plugin with 'Google Plus' or 'Google+' in the name. Check if it is installed.Affected if The Google Plus Share and +1 Button plugin is found in the plugins directory, regardless of activation status.
-
Check plugin versionIn the installed plugins list, locate the version number displayed under the plugin name. Compare it against the affected range: versions 1.0 and below.Affected if The installed version is 1.0 or any version number indicating 1.0 or lower.
-
Confirm plugin is activeIn the WordPress admin Plugins page, verify whether the plugin shows as 'Active' or 'Network Active'. The vulnerability requires an authenticated administrator to be exploitable.Affected if The plugin is currently active and accessible via the WordPress admin dashboard.
-
Access plugin settingsNavigate to the plugin settings page in WordPress admin (usually under Settings or a dedicated menu item named after the plugin). Look for fields related to Google+ sharing, buttons, or API configuration.Affected if The plugin settings page is accessible and contains user-controllable input fields where malicious scripts could be stored.
If the Google Plus Share and +1 Button plugin is installed at version 1.0 or below and is active with accessible settings, the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2024-53723 CSRF-induced stored XSS attacks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace or remove the abandoned plugin (Google Plus API shut down in 2019); if continued use is required, implement nonce-based CSRF protection and output escaping on all user-controlled inputs before storing or rendering.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-53723 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-53723 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data