CVE-2024-53724
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ronnybull IceStats icestats allows Stored XSS.This issue affects IceStats: from n/a through <= 1.3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IceStats allows authenticated users to be tricked into submitting malicious requests that result in stored XSS payloads being persisted on the server, potentially affecting all users who view the affected content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify IceStats is installed and determine its versionLocate the IceStats installation directory and check the version file or binary. Compare the installed version against the affected version range for CVE-2024-53724.Affected if IceStats is installed and the version falls within the affected range.
-
Inspect IceStats forms for anti-CSRF token presenceReview the HTML source of all state-changing forms in IceStats (e.g., settings, data submission forms). Check if each form includes a unique anti-CSRF token as a hidden field.Affected if State-changing forms lack anti-CSRF tokens or use predictable/static token values.
-
Verify server-side Origin or Referer header validationExamine the server-side code handling IceStats form submissions. Check if the code validates the Origin or Referer header before processing state-changing requests.Affected if No Origin or Referer header validation is performed on form submission endpoints.
-
Search for suspicious stored content in IceStats data storageExamine the database or file storage used by IceStats for user-submitted content. Look for stored scripts, HTML, or JavaScript that may represent injected XSS payloads.Affected if Stored XSS payloads (script tags, event handlers, or malicious URLs) are present in IceStats data.
You are affected if IceStats is installed with a vulnerable version and its forms lack anti-CSRF protections, allowing attackers to inject stored XSS payloads through authenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens on state-changing forms and validate Origin/Referer headers to prevent cross-site request forgery, which will block the attack vector used to inject stored XSS.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-53724 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-53724 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data