CVE-2024-53726
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in RealtyCandy.com RealtyCandy IDX Broker Extended realtycandy-idx-broker-extended allows Stored XSS.This issue affects RealtyCandy IDX Broker Extended: from n/a through <= 1.5.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the RealtyCandy IDX Broker Extended WordPress plugin enables attackers to inject malicious scripts (Stored XSS) through forged requests. The lack of proper CSRF protection allows authenticated or tricked administrators to execute unintended actions that persist malicious payloads within the plugin's settings or display areas.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify plugin installationNavigate to WordPress admin > Plugins and confirm 'RealtyCandy IDX Broker Extended' is installed and activeAffected if Plugin is installed and active in WordPress
-
Determine installed versionIn Plugins list, click the plugin name or view plugin file header to read the Version fieldAffected if Version is older than the patched version (any unpatched release is vulnerable)
-
Inspect plugin forms for CSRF tokensView page source of plugin admin pages (IDX settings, display options, or frontend forms). Search for 'nonce' or 'csrf' in form HTML elementsAffected if Forms lack nonce tokens or CSRF validation mechanisms in their HTML
-
Check for stored XSS in plugin settingsNavigate to plugin settings pages in admin panel. Examine input fields for IDX broker ID, display templates, or custom CSS areas for unexpected script tags or encoded contentAffected if Unexpected script tags, iframe elements, or malformed HTML present in settings fields
-
Review database for injected payloadsAccess WordPress database via phpMyAdmin or CLI. Query wp_options table for plugin-related option names containing suspicious JavaScript: SELECT * FROM wp_options WHERE option_name LIKE '%realtycandy%' OR option_value LIKE '%<script%'Affected if Plugin-related options contain script tags, event handlers, or base64-encoded malicious payloads
User is affected if the plugin is installed, running an unpatched version, and plugin forms lack CSRF nonce validation or malicious payloads already exist in settings.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to the latest patched version of RealtyCandy IDX Broker Extended. Until patched, implement anti-CSRF tokens in all plugin forms and sanitize all user-supplied input before storage and output.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-53726 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-53726 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data