CVE-2024-53761
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in P Roy WP Revisions Manager wp-revisions-manager allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Revisions Manager: from n/a through <= 1.0.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP Revisions Manager plugin for WordPress (versions through 1.0.2) allows attackers to trick authenticated users into performing unintended administrative actions due to missing or improper anti-CSRF token validation on state-changing requests.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if WP Revisions Manager is installedGo to WordPress admin dashboard > Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for WP Revisions Manager in the list of active pluginsAffected if Plugin is installed and active
-
Determine the installed versionIn the plugins list, click on the plugin to expand details or access the plugin file header (usually in the main PHP file) to read the Version commentAffected if Version is 1.0.2 or lower (any version through 1.0.2)
-
Identify state-changing functions in the pluginSearch plugin PHP files for functions that modify data: post/delete/revision actions, bulk operations, settings saves, or AJAX handlers that change WordPress stateAffected if State-changing functions exist in the plugin (they are the attack vector)
-
Verify nonce validation presenceExamine the identified state-changing functions and their associated form/AJAX handlers for calls to wp_verify_nonce or check_admin_referer; check form files for wp_nonce_field outputAffected if Forms and AJAX handlers lack wp_nonce_field or wp_verify_nonce validation
The environment is affected if WP Revisions Manager version 1.0.2 or lower is installed AND state-changing plugin functions lack proper WordPress nonce validation on their requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement WordPress nonce validation (wp_verify_nonce) on all forms and AJAX actions, and include nonce fields (wp_nonce_field) in user-facing forms. Users should update to the latest plugin version once available.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-53761 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-53761 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data