Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2024-53762

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-12-02
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in FasterThemes FastBook fastbook-responsive-appointment-booking-and-scheduling-system allows Stored XSS.This issue affects FastBook: from n/a through <= 1.1.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the FastBook WordPress appointment booking plugin allows attackers to inject malicious scripts (Stored XSS) by tricking authenticated administrators into submitting crafted requests. Attackers can exploit this by luring admin users to malicious sites or embedding crafted requests, causing the XSS payload to be stored and executed when other users view affected pages.

MitigationImplement anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing forms and validate/sanitize all user inputs server-side. Until an official patch is released, consider disabling or removing the plugin if immediate remediation is not possible.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify FastBook plugin installation
    In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and search for 'FastBook' or check the plugins directory for fastbook-related folders. Note the installed version if present.
    Affected if The FastBook plugin is installed and the version cannot be confirmed as patched against CVE-2024-53762
  2. Check plugin version against latest release
    Compare your installed version to the current version available at wordpress.org/plugins/fastbook-appointments or contact the plugin vendor for version guidance.
    Affected if The installed version is older than the patched version for this CSRF-to-Stored-XSS vulnerability
  3. Inspect plugin database entries for malicious scripts
    Query the WordPress database (wp_options table and any custom fastbook tables) for unusual script tags, iframe elements, or javascript: URLs. Look for encoded or obfuscated payloads.
    Affected if Any stored XSS payloads (script tags, event handlers, javascript: links) are found in plugin configuration or appointment data
  4. Review plugin admin pages for XSS indicators
    View the source HTML of FastBook admin pages (appointment forms, settings pages, customer lists) in a browser. Search for unexpected <script>, <img onerror>, <svg onload>, or similar XSS vectors.
    Affected if Stored XSS payloads are present in any rendered plugin pages visible to administrators or customers
  5. Check for unauthorized form submissions
    Review server access logs and WordPress activity logs for POST requests to fastbook-admin-ajax.php or plugin admin pages from unexpected referrers or with missing CSRF token headers.
    Affected if Form submission requests lack proper anti-CSRF token validation headers

A user is affected if the FastBook plugin is installed without the CVE-2024-53762 patch and any stored XSS payloads are found in the plugin's database entries or rendered pages.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing forms and validate/sanitize all user inputs server-side. Until an official patch is released, consider disabling or removing the plugin if immediate remediation is not possible.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
17.0 hours of engineering $3,000
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-53762 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-53762 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data