CVE-2024-53793
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in jerodmoore eDoc Easy Tables edoc-easy-tables allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects eDoc Easy Tables: from n/a through <= 1.29.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA CSRF vulnerability in eDoc Easy Tables version 1.29 and earlier allows authenticated attackers to forge requests that execute blind SQL injection attacks against the application's database, potentially enabling unauthorized data extraction through true/false conditional queries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify eDoc Easy Tables plugin is installedAccess the WordPress admin dashboard and navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins. Look for 'eDoc Easy Tables' in the list of active or installed plugins.Affected if The plugin is not installed or has been removed from the WordPress installation.
-
Check the installed plugin versionIn the Plugins page, find the eDoc Easy Tables entry. The version number is displayed below the plugin name. Compare this version to the affected range.Affected if The installed version is 1.29 or lower.
-
Identify state-changing forms or actionsInspect the plugin files (typically in wp-content/plugins/edoc-easy-tables) for form handlers that modify data, such as save, update, delete, or import operations. Look for PHP files containing $_POST or $_GET requests that interact with the database.Affected if The plugin contains forms or URL parameters that perform database operations without visible output (blind SQL injection scenarios).
-
Check for CSRF token validation in formsExamine the plugin PHP code for form submissions. Look for presence of wp_nonce_field(), wp_verify_nonce(), or similar token generation and validation functions in the form handling code.Affected if State-changing forms lack CSRF token generation on the form output or lack token validation in the form handler.
-
Check database queries for prepared statementsReview the plugin PHP files that execute SQL queries. Look for direct query construction with string concatenation or interpolation of user input into SQL strings, versus usage of $wpdb->prepare(), $wpdb->insert(), $wpdb->update(), or similar parameterized query methods.Affected if Database operations use string concatenation or interpolation for user-supplied input rather than parameterized queries.
A user is affected if the eDoc Easy Tables plugin is installed with version 1.29 or lower and contains forms or database operations lacking CSRF token validation and parameterized SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing forms and requests; add server-side input validation and parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection; update to a patched version when available.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-53793 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-53793 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data