CVE-2024-53856
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedrPGP is a pure Rust implementation of OpenPGP. Prior to 0.14.1, rPGP allows an attacker to trigger rpgp crashes by providing crafted data. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.14.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencerPGP versions prior to 0.14.1 contain a vulnerability that allows remote attackers to cause denial-of-service by providing crafted OpenPGP data that triggers crashes in the library. This is a parsing/input validation issue in the pure Rust OpenPGP implementation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify rPGP usage in your environmentSearch for rPGP in your dependency files (Cargo.toml, package-lock.json, Gemfile.lock, etc.) or installed packages. Check if any application or service uses the rPGP Rust library.Affected if rPGP is found as a dependency
-
Check the installed rPGP versionRun a command to display the rPGP version from your dependency lock file or installed package. Compare against the affected range: versions prior to 0.14.1.Affected if The version shown is lower than 0.14.1
-
Determine if untrusted OpenPGP data is processedInspect your application code or configuration to identify if rPGP is used to parse, validate, or process OpenPGP data from external or untrusted sources.Affected if Your system uses rPGP to parse OpenPGP data that originates from users, networks, or other untrusted sources
You are affected if rPGP version 0.14.1 or later is not in use and your system processes untrusted OpenPGP data with the rPGP library.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade rPGP to version 0.14.1 or later. Review any systems processing untrusted OpenPGP data to ensure they handle library failures gracefully.
rPGP version 0.14.1
- Locate the rPGP dependency in your project's Cargo.toml file
- Change the rPGP version specification to 0.14.1 (e.g., `rpgp = "0.14.1"`)
- Run `cargo update rpgp` to fetch the updated dependency
- Run `cargo build` to compile with the fixed version
- Run your application's test suite to verify functionality is not broken
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,232.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-53856 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-53856 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data