CVE-2024-53911
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in the server in Veritas Enterprise Vault before 15.2, ZDI-CAN-24339. It allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code because untrusted data, received on a .NET Remoting TCP port, is deserialized.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceVeritas Enterprise Vault versions prior to 15.2 contain a deserialization vulnerability in the .NET Remoting TCP listener. Attackers can send malicious serialized .NET objects to this port, triggering unsafe deserialization that leads to arbitrary code execution without authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 15.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Enterprise Vault installationCheck for the Enterprise Vault installation by examining common install paths (C:\Program Files\Veritas\Enterprise Vault) or query the Windows Services list for 'Enterprise Vault' services using 'Get-Service | Where-Object {$_.DisplayName -like "*Enterprise*Vault*"}'Affected if No Veritas Enterprise Vault installation is found - not affected. If found, continue to version check.
-
Determine installed versionLocate the EVVersion.exe or Enterprise Vault version information in the installation directory, or run 'Get-ItemProperty "HKLM:\SOFTWARE\Veritas\Enterprise Vault" -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue' to read the version from registryAffected if The installed version is 14.x or any version lower than 15.2 - potentially affected. If version is 15.2 or higher, not affected.
-
Verify .NET Remoting service is enabledCheck if the .NET Remoting service is running by examining Windows services for 'Enterprise Vault' processes listening on TCP ports. Use 'netstat -an | findstr LISTENING' to identify listening ports in the 1024-65535 range associated with Enterprise Vault processesAffected if The .NET Remoting TCP port is open and listening - vulnerable configuration present. If no such port is listening, not affected.
-
Identify exposed .NET Remoting TCP portRun 'netstat -abno' to identify which process is bound to TCP ports and determine if Enterprise Vault components are bound to accessible network interfaces (0.0.0.0 or external IP rather than 127.0.0.1)Affected if The .NET Remoting TCP port is bound to all interfaces (0.0.0.0) or an external IP address - vulnerable to remote attack. If bound to 127.0.0.1 only, risk is reduced.
A system is affected if Veritas Enterprise Vault version is below 15.2 AND the .NET Remoting TCP service is running and exposed on a reachable network interface.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped15.2
Upgrade Veritas Enterprise Vault to version 15.2 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, block or restrict access to the .NET Remoting TCP port from untrusted networks.
Enterprise Vault 15.2
- 1. Review Veritas Enterprise Vault 15.2 upgrade documentation and release notes for prerequisites and compatibility requirements
- 2. Ensure you have a complete backup of your Enterprise Vault database and configuration
- 3. Schedule a maintenance window as upgrades may require downtime
- 4. Download Veritas Enterprise Vault 15.2 from Veritas Support portal
- 5. Run the upgrade installer on the Enterprise Vault server
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful and all services are running
- 7. Monitor logs and system behavior post-upgrade to confirm stability
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-53911 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-53911 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data