CVE-2024-53960
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.21 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.21 and earlier contain a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability where malicious JavaScript can be injected into form fields. The injected script persists on the server and executes in victim browsers when they navigate to pages containing the compromised form fields.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.22.0< 2024.11.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Adobe Experience Manager versionNavigate to the AEM Welcome page or check the crx-quickstart/app.properties file for the 'version' or 'crx.quickstart.version' property. You can also query the JMX console or use the versioninfo command-line tool.Affected if The installed version is less than 6.5.22.0 or less than 2024.11.0 (for cloud/continuous delivery)
-
Identify forms that accept user inputReview the AEM Forms implementation by accessing the Forms & Documents console at /aem/forms.html or inspecting the form models and adaptive form configurations stored under /content/forms/af in the CRX/DE repository.Affected if The environment uses AEM Forms with adaptive forms that accept user-submitted data in fields such as text inputs, text areas, or other form components
-
Inspect form field data for malicious scriptsQuery the CRX/DE repository under /content/forms/af and examine stored form submissions in the repository or the AEM Forms datastore. Look for script tags, javascript: handlers, or HTML event attributes in field values.Affected if Form field data contains persisted JavaScript code, HTML tags, or event handlers that were not sanitized on input
-
Review published content for injected scriptsCheck published pages containing forms at /editor.html and inspect the rendered HTML source. Use the CRX/DE Lite to search for submitted form data under /content/forms/submissions/ or the corresponding data store.Affected if Rendered form pages include unsanitized script content when viewed in a browser
A user is affected if their AEM installation version is below 6.5.22.0 or below 2024.11.0 AND the system has forms that accept user input where unsanitized data could be stored and rendered.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.22.02024.11.0
Update Adobe Experience Manager to version 6.5.22 or later to apply the security patch that addresses this stored XSS vulnerability.
6.5.22.0 or 2024.11.0 or later
- 1. Identify the current Adobe Experience Manager version in use by checking the AEM About page or system console
- 2. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade process
- 3. Back up the current AEM instance including the repository, database, and configuration files
- 4. Download Adobe Experience Manager version 6.5.22.0 or 2024.11.0 (or later) from the official Adobe distribution or licensing portal
- 5. Follow Adobe's official upgrade documentation to perform the upgrade
- 6. After upgrade, verify the AEM instance is running correctly and all custom code/components function as expected
- 7. Validate that the XSS vulnerability is remediated by testing the previously vulnerable form fields
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-53960 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-53960 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data