CVE-2024-54025
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability [CWE-78] in Fortinet FortiIsolator CLI before version 2.4.6 allows a privileged attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted CLI requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFortiIsolator CLI before version 2.4.6 contains an OS command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) where improper neutralization of special elements allows a privileged attacker to execute unauthorized operating system commands through crafted CLI requests. The attacker requires authenticated privileged access to the FortiIsolator device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.4.3, < 2.4.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FortiIsolator installationLocate FortiIsolator on the system by checking for its CLI executable, service, or management interface. Common methods include searching for 'fortiisolator' in installed packages, running processes, or checking /opt/ for Fortinet installations.Affected if FortiIsolator software is found running or installed on the system
-
Determine installed versionRun the FortiIsolator CLI command to retrieve the system version. Typically this involves executing 'get system status' or 'diagnose system version' within the FortiIsolator CLI console, or checking the firmware file if upgrading from ISO.Affected if The reported version falls within >= 2.4.3 and < 2.4.7
-
Confirm CLI access is enabledVerify that the FortiIsolator CLI service is accessible. Check the administrative interface configuration via 'show system interface' or similar CLI commands to confirm CLI ports (typically SSH on port 22 or HTTP/HTTPS) are listening and enabled.Affected if CLI access is enabled and reachable on the network
-
Audit privileged CLI user accessReview the list of configured privileged users with CLI access using 'get system admin' or similar administrative commands. Identify all accounts with privilege level sufficient to execute CLI commands.Affected if Multiple privileged users exist or unauthorized privileged accounts are present
-
Check for suspicious command patternsReview CLI command logs, audit logs, or system logs for unusual or unexpected commands executed through the CLI interface. Look for indicators such as commands containing shell metacharacters (;, |, &, $) or unexpected program execution calls.Affected if Log analysis reveals CLI commands that are unusual, unauthorized, or contain suspicious patterns consistent with injection attempts
A user is affected if FortiIsolator version 2.4.3 through 2.4.6 is installed and the CLI interface is accessible to authenticated privileged users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.4.7
Upgrade FortiIsolator to version 2.4.6 or later. Until patched, restrict CLI access to only trusted, privileged users and monitor for suspicious command patterns.
FortiIsolator 2.4.6 or later
- 1. Identify the current FortiIsolator version by accessing the CLI or web interface
- 2. Confirm the current version is >= 2.4.3 and < 2.4.6
- 3. Download FortiIsolator version 2.4.6 or later from the Fortinet support portal (support.fortinet.com)
- 4. Review the upgrade procedure in the FortiIsolator administration guide
- 5. Execute the upgrade following the documented procedure, preferably during a maintenance window
- 6. After upgrade, verify the new version is 2.4.6 or higher
- 7. Confirm the vulnerability is resolved by checking the FortiGuard advisory for CVE-2024-54025
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,160.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-54025 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-54025 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data