PhpmybackupproApplication

CVE-2024-5415

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-05-28
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability have been discovered in PhpMyBackupPro affecting version 2.3 that could allow an attacker to execute XSS through /phpmybackuppro/backup.php, 'comments' and 'db' parameters. This vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to create a specially crafted URL and send it to a victim to retrieve their session details.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

PhpMyBackupPro 2.3 contains a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the backup.php script. The 'comments' and 'db' parameters are not properly sanitized before being reflected in the HTML output, allowing an attacker to inject malicious JavaScript. This can be exploited by tricking a victim into clicking a specially crafted URL, enabling session hijacking through stolen session cookies or other session data.

MitigationImplement proper input validation and output encoding for the 'comments' and 'db' parameters in backup.php. Additionally, set HttpOnly and Secure flags on session cookies to prevent JavaScript access. Upgrade to any available patched version of PhpMyBackupPro.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
PhpmybackupproApplication
Affected:= 2.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate PhpMyBackupPro installation
    Search web root directories for the 'phpMyBackupPro' or 'pmbackup' folder, or check for 'backup.php' file. Common paths include /phpMyBackupPro/, /pmbackup/, or subdirectories under web root.
    Affected if The application is found on the server at any accessible web path.
  2. Identify installed version
    Open the file 'version.php' in the PhpMyBackupPro directory, or check the footer/login page source for a version string. The version may also be in a config or README file.
    Affected if The version is exactly 2.3 (or falls within the 2.3.x line if broader ranges are later identified).
  3. Verify backup.php exists and is accessible
    Access the backup.php script via HTTP/HTTPS at the identified path, for example: http://example.com/phpMyBackupPro/backup.php
    Affected if The script loads without returning a 404 or access denied error.
  4. Check for reflected parameters in output
    Send a request to backup.php with test values in the vulnerable parameters, for example: backup.php?comments=test&db=test. View the page source and search for the exact string 'test' to see if it is reflected without encoding.
    Affected if The parameter values appear unescaped in the HTML output, indicating lack of output encoding.

If PhpMyBackupPro version 2.3 is installed with backup.php accessible and the 'comments' or 'db' parameters reflect user input unescaped in HTML, the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2024-5415.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper input validation and output encoding for the 'comments' and 'db' parameters in backup.php. Additionally, set HttpOnly and Secure flags on session cookies to prevent JavaScript access. Upgrade to any available patched version of PhpMyBackupPro.

Fix this in Phpmybackuppro Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-5415 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-5415 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data