CVE-2024-54183
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Sterling B2B Integrator and IBM Sterling File Gateway 6.0.0.0 through 6.1.2.6 and 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.4 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStored XSS vulnerability in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator and Sterling File Gateway Web UI allows authenticated users to inject arbitrary JavaScript code that executes in other users' browsers, potentially exposing credentials or session data within trusted sessions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.0.0.0, < 6.1.2.7>= 6.2, < 6.2.0.5>= 6.0.0.0, < 6.1.2.7>= 6.2.0.0, < 6.2.0.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify IBM Sterling B2B Integrator versionLocate the product version from the installation directory, typically in a version file or about page accessible via the web interface at / SterlingB2BIntegrator/about.do or check install_dir/version.txtAffected if Version is 6.0.0.0 through 6.1.2.6, or 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.4
-
Identify IBM Sterling File Gateway versionLocate the product version from the installation directory or access the about page via the web interface at / SterlingFileGateway/about.do or check install_dir/version.txtAffected if Version is 6.0.0.0 through 6.1.2.6, or 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.4
-
Confirm Web UI is enabledVerify the web-based user interface is accessible by attempting to reach the login page at the standard endpoints such as / SterlingB2BIntegrator/login or / SterlingFileGateway/loginAffected if Web UI is exposed and accessible to users
-
Check for stored scripts in Web UI inputsReview any user-controllable fields in the Web UI such as user profiles, custom labels, or configuration fields where data may be stored and rendered without proper sanitizationAffected if Unsanitized user input is being stored and displayed in the Web UI
You are affected if either IBM Sterling B2B Integrator or Sterling File Gateway is running a version between 6.0.0.0 and 6.1.2.6, or between 6.2.0.0 and 6.2.0.4, and the Web UI is enabled and accessible to authenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.1.2.76.2.0.5
Update to IBM Sterling B2B Integrator and Sterling File Gateway versions beyond 6.1.2.6 and 6.2.0.4 as specified in IBM security bulletins; review and sanitize user inputs in the Web UI.
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator: 6.1.2.7 or later (6.0.x/6.1.x branch); 6.2.0.5 or later (6.2.x branch) | IBM Sterling File Gateway: 6.1.2.7 or later (6.0.x/6.1.x branch); 6.2.0.5 or later (6.2.x branch)
- Review IBM Sterling B2B Integrator and Sterling File Gateway upgrade documentation in IBM Documentation
- Back up current system configuration and database
- Test the upgrade in a non-production environment before applying to production
- Download IBM Sterling B2B Integrator version 6.1.2.7 or later (for 6.0.x/6.1.x versions)
- Download IBM Sterling B2B Integrator version 6.2.0.5 or later (for 6.2.x versions)
- Apply the upgrade following IBM's standard upgrade procedures
- Verify the XSS vulnerability is resolved by testing that JavaScript code is no longer executable in the Web UI fields
- Confirm all existing functionality works correctly after upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-54183 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-54183 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data