CVE-2024-5422
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn uncontrolled resource consumption of file descriptors in SEH Computertechnik utnserver Pro, SEH Computertechnik utnserver ProMAX, SEH Computertechnik INU-100 allows DoS via HTTP.This issue affects utnserver Pro, utnserver ProMAX, INU-100 version 20.1.22 and below.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis vulnerability involves uncontrolled consumption of file descriptors in SEH Computertechnik utnserver devices (Pro, ProMAX, INU-100) leading to denial of service via HTTP requests. The issue allows an attacker to exhaust available file descriptors by sending HTTP requests, preventing the device from accepting new connections.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the utnserver device modelAccess the device admin interface or check the device label to confirm it is an SEH Computertechnik utnserver Pro, utnserver ProMAX, or INU-100 modelAffected if The device is one of these three models (utnserver Pro, ProMAX, or INU-100)
-
Determine the firmware versionLog into the device web interface or check via SNMP/sysinfo to retrieve the current firmware version numberAffected if The installed firmware version is below 20.1.22 (versions 20.1.22 and above contain the fix)
-
Verify HTTP service is accessibleConfirm the device has its HTTP management interface exposed on the network by attempting to reach the device IP on port 80 or checking the service status in the admin panelAffected if HTTP service is enabled and reachable from network segments where untrusted users could send requests
-
Check for connection acceptance behaviorAttempt to establish new HTTP connections to the device or observe whether new connections are being refused or timing outAffected if The device is unable to accept new HTTP connections or shows signs of resource exhaustion
A user is affected if they have an utnserver Pro, ProMAX, or INU-100 device running firmware version below 20.1.22 with HTTP interface accessible to potential attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the firmware to a version above 20.1.22. As a temporary workaround, implement network-level rate limiting or firewall rules to restrict HTTP requests from untrusted sources.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-5422 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-5422 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data