CVE-2024-54229
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in straightvisions GmbH SV100 Companion sv100-companion allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects SV100 Companion: from n/a through <= 2.0.02.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSV100 Companion contains an Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability that allows authenticated or possibly unauthenticated users to escalate their privileges beyond what should be permitted by the application's privilege model. The flaw exists in versions up to and including 2.0.02, where improper validation or assignment of user permissions enables privilege escalation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify SV100 Companion is installedIdentify whether SV100 Companion software is present on the system, either as a running service, installed application, or embedded firmware component.Affected if SV100 Companion is found on the system
-
Determine the installed versionLocate and retrieve the version information for the SV100 Companion installation, typically found in the application itself, system registry, or firmware information.Affected if The version cannot be determined or is 2.0.02 or lower
-
Compare version to affected rangeCompare your installed version against the affected range: any version up to and including 2.0.02 is within the vulnerable range.Affected if The installed version is 2.0.02 or lower
-
Inspect user privilege configurationExamine the application's user privilege assignment or role-based access control configuration to identify how user permissions are defined and validated.Affected if Privilege roles appear misconfigured, improperly validated, or allow unauthorized permission escalation
-
Review authentication settingsCheck the authentication and access control settings, particularly any configuration allowing user registration, role assignment, or permission modifications.Affected if Authentication controls are weak, allow unauthenticated access, or permit privilege escalation
If SV100 Companion version 2.0.02 or lower is installed with default or misconfigured privilege assignment settings, the system is likely affected by this privilege escalation vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to a patched version of SV100 Companion if available. If no patch exists, restrict administrative access to trusted IP addresses and review the application's privilege assignment logic for proper role-based access controls.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-54229 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-54229 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data