dbcve.org
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2024-54331

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-12-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Micha I Plant A Tree i-plant-a-tree allows Stored XSS.This issue affects I Plant A Tree: from n/a through <= 1.7.3.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

CSRF vulnerability in the I Plant A Tree WordPress plugin (versions <=1.7.3) allows attackers to inject stored XSS by tricking authenticated administrators into submitting malicious requests to plugin settings or content endpoints.

MitigationUpdate to patched version when available; otherwise disable the plugin. Ensure all admin form submissions implement anti-CSRF tokens.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify I Plant A Tree plugin is installed
    Check the WordPress plugins directory for the 'i-plant-a-tree' folder, or query via wp-cli: wp plugin list --filter='i-plant-a-tree'
    Affected if Plugin folder exists in wp-content/plugins/
  2. Check installed version
    Read the plugin header from the main PHP file (wp-content/plugins/i-plant-a-tree/i-plant-a-tree.php) or run: wp plugin get i-plant-a-tree --field=version
    Affected if Version is 1.7.3 or lower
  3. Confirm administrator accounts exist
    Query WordPress user database for administrator role users: wp user list --role=administrator --field=user_login
    Affected if At least one admin user account is active on the site
  4. Verify plugin settings are accessible
    Attempt to access the plugin admin settings page (typically under Settings menu in WordPress admin)
    Affected if Plugin settings page loads and accepts admin submissions

If the plugin is installed at version 1.7.3 or lower and administrators can access its settings or content endpoints, the site is vulnerable to this CSRF-to-stored-XSS flaw.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update to patched version when available; otherwise disable the plugin. Ensure all admin form submissions implement anti-CSRF tokens.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-54331 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-54331 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data