CVE-2024-54389
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Eduardo addWeather myweather allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects addWeather: from n/a through <= 2.5.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the addWeather function of the Eduardo myweather application allows attackers to induce authenticated users to perform unintended actions (adding weather locations) via forged requests.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm myweather application deploymentSearch your codebase, deployment artifacts, or installed packages for the Eduardo myweather application. Look for files named myweather, or modules/packages with 'myweather' or 'eduardo' in the name.Affected if The myweather application by Eduardo is present in the environment
-
Locate the addWeather functionSearch source code for the addWeather function definition or handler. This may appear as a JavaScript function, API endpoint, or server-side route related to adding weather locations.Affected if An addWeather function or endpoint that handles weather location additions exists in the code
-
Inspect addWeather for CSRF token validationExamine the addWeather function source code. Look for code that validates anti-CSRF tokens, synchronizer tokens, or similar CSRF protection mechanisms before processing the request.Affected if The addWeather function does not validate anti-CSRF tokens before processing requests
-
Check server-side Origin/Referer header validationReview server configuration or middleware code that handles addWeather requests. Look for logic that validates the Origin or Referer HTTP headers to verify request origin.Affected if The server does not validate Origin or Referer headers for addWeather requests
-
Verify session authentication stateConfirm that the addWeather function requires authenticated user session. Check if the function executes within an authenticated context.Affected if The addWeather function executes state-changing operations for authenticated users without CSRF protection
You are affected if the Eduardo myweather application is deployed with an addWeather function that lacks anti-CSRF token validation and Origin/Referer header checking for authenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on all state-changing operations including the addWeather function, and validate the Origin/Referer headers server-side.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-54389 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-54389 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data