Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2024-54397

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-12-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in antonio.gocaj Go Animate goanimate allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Go Animate: from n/a through <= 1.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Go Animate allows attackers to trick authenticated users into executing unintended requests that result in Stored XSS payloads being saved to the application. This combines two vulnerabilities where CSRF enables the injection of malicious scripts that persist and execute when other users view the compromised content.

MitigationImplement anti-CSRF tokens for all state-changing operations and apply proper input validation with context-aware output encoding to prevent stored XSS execution.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Go Animate installation
    Search for Go Animate files, services, or web applications running on the environment. Check for directories or processes containing 'goanimate' or 'animate' in the name, or look for the application's login page or admin interface accessible via browser or network scan.
    Affected if Go Animate software is found running in the environment.
  2. Verify CSRF token presence in state-changing forms
    Locate forms that submit content to the server (such as content creation, profile updates, or admin actions). Inspect the HTML source of these forms to determine if a CSRF token, anti-CSRF token, or any unique request validation token is included as a hidden field or header.
    Affected if Forms that modify data lack CSRF tokens or unique request validation tokens.
  3. Test for CSRF token validation on submission
    Submit a state-changing request (such as saving content) without the expected token, using a tool like Burp Suite or curl, and observe whether the server accepts or rejects the request.
    Affected if The server accepts and processes requests without validating a CSRF token.
  4. Inspect input handling for stored content
    Create or submit content containing a script tag (such as <script>alert(1)</script>) through the application's content creation features. Retrieve the stored content and examine whether the script tag is rendered as plain text or executed as code.
    Affected if The submitted script tags are rendered and executed when the content is displayed to users, indicating missing output encoding.
  5. Check for context-aware output encoding
    View the page source or inspect DOM elements where user-submitted content is displayed. Determine if special characters like <, >, ', " are encoded (to &lt;, &gt;, &#x27;, &quot;) or if raw HTML is rendered.
    Affected if User-submitted content is rendered as raw HTML without encoding, allowing stored XSS execution.

The environment is affected if Go Animate is present and state-changing operations lack CSRF protection combined with missing input validation or output encoding that allows stored XSS payloads to persist and execute.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement anti-CSRF tokens for all state-changing operations and apply proper input validation with context-aware output encoding to prevent stored XSS execution.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing10.0 h
  • Review / QA6.0 h
34.0 hours of engineering $5,940
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,504.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-54397 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-54397 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data