CVE-2024-54419
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in chenyenming Ui Slider Filter By Price ui-slider-filter-by-price allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Ui Slider Filter By Price: from n/a through <= 1.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Ui Slider Filter By Price component (ui-slider-filter-by-price) allows attackers to induce authenticated users to perform unintended filter actions. The component lacks proper anti-CSRF token validation on its form submissions or AJAX requests.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify ui-slider-filter-by-price component usageSearch your codebase for imports or references to 'ui-slider-filter-by-price' or 'uiSliderFilterByPrice' component. Check frontend component directories, template files, and module imports.Affected if The component is present and used in the application
-
Inspect form submission handlingExamine the component's source code for form submission handlers (submit event listeners, form action attributes, POST requests). Look for any AJAX/fetch calls triggered by slider interactions.Affected if The component submits data via forms or AJAX without anti-CSRF token validation
-
Verify CSRF token presence in requestsReview the component's network requests (form data or AJAX headers) to determine if a CSRF token, anti-CSRF token, or security token is included with each state-changing request.Affected if No token parameter or header is sent with filter requests
-
Check token validation on server sideExamine server-side code that handles the filter requests. Verify if the endpoint validates CSRF tokens before processing state-changing operations.Affected if Server-side handlers do not validate or check for anti-CSRF tokens
-
Inspect cookie configurationCheck if session or authentication cookies used with this component have SameSite attributes set (SameSite=Strict or SameSite=Lax), or if the application relies solely on cookie-based CSRF protection.Affected if Cookies lack SameSite attributes AND no token-based CSRF protection is implemented
A user is affected if the ui-slider-filter-by-price component is in use and its form submissions or AJAX requests lack anti-CSRF token validation or proper SameSite cookie protection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) or SameSite cookie attributes on all state-changing requests within the affected component to prevent cross-origin forged requests.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-54419 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-54419 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data