CVE-2024-54420
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Aleksandr Novikov Metrika metrika allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Metrika: from n/a through <= 1.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCSRF vulnerability in Metrika <= 1.2 allows attackers to induce authenticated users to perform unwanted state-changing actions. With CVSS 7.1 (HIGH), this could allow account takeover or data manipulation via forged requests.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Metrika installation versionLocate the Metrika application and check its version number (typically found in package.json, version file, or admin interface under 'About' or 'Version' settings)Affected if Installed version is 1.2 or lower, or version cannot be determined (indicating outdated installation)
-
Verify anti-CSRF token implementationInspect the source code of state-changing endpoints (POST/PUT/DELETE requests) for presence of CSRF token validation logic - look for token verification middleware, synchronizer token pattern implementation, or token generation/validation functionsAffected if No CSRF token validation is found in state-changing endpoint handlers
-
Check Origin/Referer header validationReview application configuration or middleware for Origin and Referer header validation on sensitive requests - examine server config files or request handling middleware for header checksAffected if No Origin or Referer header validation is configured or enforced
-
Examine session/authentication mechanismReview how authenticated sessions are handled - check if application uses session cookies or tokens and whether these are tied to CSRF protection mechanismsAffected if Application uses cookie-based authentication without CSRF protection tied to sessions
You are affected if Metrika version is 1.2 or lower AND state-changing endpoints lack anti-CSRF token validation and Origin/Referer header checks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on all state-changing endpoints, and validate Origin/Referer headers as defense-in-depth.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-54420 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-54420 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data