Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2024-54423

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-12-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jesse Overright Social Media Sharing social-media-sharing allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Social Media Sharing: from n/a through <= 1.1.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A CSRF vulnerability in the Social Media Sharing plugin allows attackers to craft malicious requests that result in stored XSS. An attacker could trick an authenticated administrator into submitting a crafted request that injects malicious scripts into the plugin's settings or shared content, which then executes when viewed by other users.

MitigationImplement anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) for all admin actions and form submissions, combined with proper output sanitization using WordPress sanitization functions to prevent stored XSS.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Social Media Sharing plugin is installed
    Access WordPress admin dashboard, navigate to Plugins section, or inspect the /wp-content/plugins/ directory for a social-media-sharing or similar named plugin folder. Note the installed version from the plugin headers.
    Affected if The plugin folder exists and the plugin is active in WordPress.
  2. Check admin action handlers for nonce verification
    Inspect PHP files in the plugin directory, specifically looking for admin action handlers (files handling form submissions, settings saves, or AJAX requests). Search for 'wp_verify_nonce', 'check_admin_referer', or 'check_ajax_referer' function calls.
    Affected if Admin action handlers lack nonce verification calls, meaning no anti-CSRF protection exists.
  3. Inspect form submissions for nonce fields
    Examine PHP files that render admin forms (settings pages). Search for 'wp_nonce_field', 'wp_nonce_url', or 'nonce_field' function calls within <form> tags.
    Affected if Admin forms do not include nonce fields, leaving them vulnerable to CSRF attacks.
  4. Verify output sanitization on settings/content display
    Inspect PHP files that display plugin settings or shared content in the frontend. Look for WordPress sanitization functions such as 'esc_html', 'esc_attr', 'esc_url', or 'sanitize_text_field' when outputting user-controlled data.
    Affected if Plugin outputs settings or content without proper sanitization, allowing stored XSS.
  5. Confirm plugin handles user-supplied content
    Review the plugin code to determine if it accepts and stores user-generated content (social share text, custom messages, URLs) that gets displayed to other users.
    Affected if The plugin stores and displays user-supplied content without sanitization.

The environment is affected if the Social Media Sharing plugin is installed and either lacks nonce verification on admin actions or fails to sanitize output when displaying plugin settings or shared content to users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) for all admin actions and form submissions, combined with proper output sanitization using WordPress sanitization functions to prevent stored XSS.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-54423 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-54423 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data