CVE-2024-54438
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in gaxx Gaxx Keywords gaxx-keywords allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Gaxx Keywords: from n/a through <= 0.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA CSRF vulnerability in the gaxx-keywords WordPress plugin (versions <= 0.2) allows authenticated or unauthenticated attackers to craft malicious requests that inject stored XSS payloads into the database. When other administrators or users access the affected pages, the persisted JavaScript executes in their browser context.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify gaxx-keywords plugin is installedNavigate to WordPress admin dashboard > Plugins > Installed Plugins, or inspect /wp-content/plugins/ directory for gaxx-keywords folderAffected if The gaxx-keywords plugin folder exists in the WordPress plugins directory
-
Determine installed plugin versionCheck the plugin header in main plugin file (usually gaxx-keywords.php) for the Version: field, or view the plugin details in WordPress admin plugins listAffected if The reported version is 0.2 or lower (e.g., 0.2, 0.1, any version <= 0.2)
-
Inspect plugin for nonce implementationExamine plugin PHP source code for presence of wp_nonce_field(), wp_nonce_verify(), or check_admin_referer() calls on form handlers and AJAX endpointsAffected if Forms or AJAX actions lack nonce verification code entirely or have non-functional nonces
-
Identify data handling for stored XSSReview plugin code that processes and saves user input to the database, and code that outputs this data to pages (looking for missing sanitize_text_field(), esc_html(), esc_attr() calls)Affected if User-supplied data is saved to database without sanitization or rendered in HTML without output escaping
User is affected if gaxx-keywords plugin version 0.2 or lower is installed AND the plugin lacks proper CSRF tokens on forms/endpoints AND user input is not sanitized before storage or escaped on output.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement WordPress nonces and CSRF tokens on all forms and AJAX endpoints, add proper nonce verification on server-side request handling, and ensure all user-supplied data is sanitized and output is escaped before rendering.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-54438 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-54438 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data