Command InjectionWeakness · CWE-77

CVE-2024-55414

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-01-07
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability exits in driver SmSerl64.sys in Motorola SM56 Modem WDM Driver v6.12.23.0, which allows low-privileged users to mapping physical memory via specially crafted IOCTL requests . This can be exploited for privilege escalation, code execution under high privileges, and information disclosure. These signed drivers can also be used to bypass the Microsoft driver-signing policy to deploy malicious code.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Motorola SM56 Modem WDM Driver (SmSerl64.sys v6.12.23.0) contains a flaw in its IOCTL handler that allows low-privileged users to map physical memory directly. This gives attackers kernel-level access, enabling privilege escalation to SYSTEM, arbitrary code execution, and information disclosure. The driver is signed, so it also bypasses Microsoft's driver-signing requirements, functioning as a Bring Your Own Vulnerable Driver (BYOVD) primitive.

MitigationRemove or disable the Motorola SM56 modem driver if unused; if the hardware is required, apply any vendor updates or replace with a supported alternative; consider blocking driver loading via Windows Driver Policy or HVCI if the driver is not essential.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate the Motorola SM56 driver file
    Search for SmSerl64.sys on the system using: Get-ChildItem -Path C:\Windows\System32\drivers -Recurse -Filter SmSerl64.sys -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue | Select-Object FullName
    Affected if The driver file SmSerl64.sys exists in the system drivers directory
  2. Check the driver file version
    Right-click the driver file, select Properties, then Details to view the File Version field. Alternatively, run: (Get-Item 'C:\Windows\System32\drivers\SmSerl64.sys').VersionInfo
    Affected if The file version is 6.12.23.0 or any version that matches the vulnerable release
  3. Verify if the driver is currently loaded
    Run: Get-ProcessModule -ModuleName SmSerl64.sys 2>$null; or check loaded drivers with: driverquery /v | findstr -i SmSerl64
    Affected if The driver is loaded and running in kernel memory
  4. Check the driver service configuration
    Run: sc query SmSerl64 (or look for a service named similar to 'Motorola SM56' in services.msc)
    Affected if A service associated with the Motorola SM56 driver exists and is in a Running state
  5. Test IOCTL access (requires elevated privileges for full test)
    Use Sysinternals WinObj or check device object existence: open Device Manager, view show hidden devices, look under Non-Plug and Play Drivers for SM56 or similar entries
    Affected if The driver exposes a device interface that low-privileged users can open and send IOCTL requests to

A system is affected if the SmSerl64.sys driver file is present with version 6.12.23.0 and is currently loaded or configured to run, allowing unprivileged users to access the vulnerable IOCTL handler for physical memory mapping.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Remove or disable the Motorola SM56 modem driver if unused; if the hardware is required, apply any vendor updates or replace with a supported alternative; consider blocking driver loading via Windows Driver Policy or HVCI if the driver is not essential.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-55414 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-55414 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data