SuricataApplication · Oisf

CVE-2024-55605

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-01-06
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 7.0.8 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Prior to 7.0.8, a large input buffer to the to_lowercase, to_uppercase, strip_whitespace, compress_whitespace, dotprefix, header_lowercase, strip_pseudo_headers, url_decode, or xor transform can lead to a stack overflow causing Suricata to crash. The issue has been addressed in Suricata 7.0.8.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Suricata versions prior to 7.0.8 contain a stack overflow vulnerability in multiple string transformation functions (to_lowercase, to_uppercase, strip_whitespace, compress_whitespace, dotprefix, header_lowercase, strip_pseudo_headers, url_decode, and xor). When these transforms receive a large input buffer, the stack overflow causes Suricata to crash, resulting in denial of service.

MitigationUpgrade Suricata to version 7.0.8 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, consider restricting or validating input sizes to the affected transform functions at upstream inspection points.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SuricataApplication
Affected:< 7.0.8

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed Suricata version
    Run 'suricata --version' or 'suricata -V' to display the version number
    Affected if The version displayed is less than 7.0.8 (for example, 7.0.7, 7.0.6, 7.0.5, etc.)
  2. Verify Suricata is actively processing traffic
    Check if Suricata is running and processing packets. Look at stats via 'suricata --stats' or check process status
    Affected if Suricata is actively ingesting network traffic (especially HTTP, DNS, or TLS streams) which may use the affected string transformation functions
  3. Determine if string transforms are in use
    Review Suricata configuration files (suricata.yaml) and loaded rules for use of transforms: to_lowercase, to_uppercase, strip_whitespace, compress_whitespace, dotprefix, header_lowercase, strip_pseudo_headers, url_decode, or xor. These may appear in sticky buffers or transform keywords in rules
    Affected if Any rules or configuration reference the affected transformation functions and Suricata processes traffic with those rules enabled

If the installed Suricata version is below 7.0.8 and the system processes traffic using rules or configs that invoke the affected string transformation functions, the environment is vulnerable to stack overflow and potential denial of service.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 7.0.8 or later
Fixed in 7.0.8
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Suricata to version 7.0.8 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, consider restricting or validating input sizes to the affected transform functions at upstream inspection points.

Recommended fix High confidence

Suricata 7.0.8

  1. Check current Suricata version using 'suricata --version'
  2. Upgrade to Suricata 7.0.8 or later using your distribution's package manager or by building from source

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Suricata Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,200
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,520.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-55605 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-55605 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data