CVE-2024-55946
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedPlayloom Engine is an open-source, high-performance game development engine. Engine Beta v0.0.1 has a security vulnerability related to data storage, specifically when using the collaboration features. When collaborating with another user, they may have access to personal information you have entered into the software. This poses a risk to user privacy. The maintainers of Playloom Engine have temporarily disabled the collaboration feature until a fix can be implemented. When Engine Beta v0.0.2 is released, it is expected to contain a patch addressing this issue. Users should refrain from using the collaboration feature in the meantime.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencePlayloom Engine Beta v0.0.1 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in its collaboration feature. When users collaborate with others, personal information entered into the software is improperly exposed to collaborating users due to insufficient access controls or data isolation in the collaboration data storage mechanism.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Playloom Engine Beta versionCheck the software's built-in 'About' or 'Version' menu option, or inspect the application metadata (such as the executable properties, installer details, or version file included with the installation)Affected if The installed version is v0.0.1 (any build of this specific version)
-
Locate collaboration feature settingsAccess the application's main settings or preferences panel and look for sections labeled 'Collaboration', 'Share', 'Team', 'Users', or similar terms describing shared access functionalityAffected if The collaboration feature is present and accessible in the UI or configuration files
-
Verify collaboration is enabledCheck the collaboration settings for an active/enabled status indicator, or examine configuration files for a flag such as 'collaboration_enabled', 'sharing_enabled', or similar boolean settingAffected if Collaboration sharing is turned on or configured to allow multiple users
-
Inspect collaboration user data exposureCreate a test collaboration session with a second user account, then observe whether personal information fields (such as name, email, profile data, or custom personal entries) entered by one user become visible to the other collaborating user without explicit sharingAffected if Personal information entered by one user is visible to another collaborating user who should not have access to that data
A user is affected if running Playloom Engine Beta v0.0.1 with the collaboration feature enabled, where personal data entered into the application is visible to other collaborating users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedDisable or refrain from using the collaboration feature in Engine Beta v0.0.1 until upgrading to v0.0.2 when the patch is released. Avoid entering personal information into the software while collaboration remains enabled.
Engine Beta v0.0.2
- 1. Check the current installed version of Playloom Engine (e.g., via CLI command like `playloom --version` or checking the application metadata)
- 2. If version is Engine Beta v0.0.1, do not use the collaboration feature until upgrade is complete
- 3. Download Engine Beta v0.0.2 from the official Playloom Engine repository or release page on GitHub
- 4. Follow the standard upgrade procedure documented for Playloom Engine (typically: backup existing project data, install the new version, verify installation)
- 5. After upgrading to v0.0.2, verify the collaboration feature has been re-enabled and is functioning correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-55946 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-55946 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data