Improper Privilege ManagementWeakness · CWE-269

CVE-2024-55954

HIGH · 8.7 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-01-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
93/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
OpenObserve is a cloud-native observability platform. A vulnerability in the user management endpoint `/api/{org_id}/users/{email_id}` allows an "Admin" role user to remove a "Root" user from the organization. This violates the intended privilege hierarchy, enabling a non-root user to remove the highest-privileged account. Due to insufficient role checks, the `remove_user_from_org` function does not prevent an "Admin" user from removing a "Root" user. As a result, an attacker with an "Admin" role can remove critical "Root" users, potentially gaining effective full control by eliminating the highest-privileged accounts. The `DELETE /api/{org_id}/users/{email_id}` endpoint is affected. This issue has been addressed in release version `0.14.1` and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

OpenObserve's user management endpoint DELETE /api/{org_id}/users/{email_id} contains a privilege escalation vulnerability where the remove_user_from_org function lacks proper role-based access control checks, allowing an Admin-level user to remove Root users from the organization.

MitigationUpgrade to OpenObserve version 0.14.1 or later to resolve the insufficient role validation in the user removal endpoint.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify OpenObserve version
    Check the running OpenObserve instance version by querying the /api/health endpoint or inspecting the container/binary version metadata
    Affected if Version is below 0.14.1 (the patched release)
  2. Confirm API endpoint accessibility
    Verify the DELETE /api/{org_id}/users/{email_id} endpoint is accessible by sending an authenticated request with an Admin role token
    Affected if Endpoint responds to DELETE requests from Admin-level accounts
  3. Verify Admin role exists in organization
    List users in the organization via GET /api/{org_id}/users and check for users with the Admin role
    Affected if At least one user with Admin role exists in the organization
  4. Check for Root users in organization
    Query the user list and identify users assigned the Root role within the same organization
    Affected if Root role users are present and can be targeted by Admin users

Environment is affected if running OpenObserve version below 0.14.1 and the DELETE /api/{org_id}/users/{email_id} endpoint is accessible to Admin role users who can then remove Root users from the organization.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to OpenObserve version 0.14.1 or later to resolve the insufficient role validation in the user removal endpoint.

Recommended fix High confidence

0.14.1

  1. 1. Back up your current OpenObserve installation and configuration.
  2. 2. Review the OpenObserve upgrade documentation for your current version.
  3. 3. Upgrade OpenObserve to version 0.14.1 or later.
  4. 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version number.
  5. 5. Confirm that the vulnerability is resolved by testing that an Admin role user can no longer remove a Root user from the organization.
Caveat Review release notes for any breaking changes between your current version and 0.14.1

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-55954 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-55954 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data