CVE-2024-56001
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in ksher thailand Ksher ksher-payment allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Ksher: from n/a through <= 1.1.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing Authorization vulnerability in Ksher payment module allows attackers to access functionality without proper authentication due to incorrectly configured access control security levels. The vulnerability affects versions up to and including 1.1.1, likely enabling unauthorized access to payment operations or administrative functions that should require authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Ksher payment module is installedReview your application's dependency manifest (e.g., composer.json, package.json, requirements.txt, or similar) for the presence of a Ksher payment module or library. Check source code directories for any ksher-related modules, plugins, or vendor folders.Affected if The Ksher payment module is present in your codebase or dependencies.
-
Determine the installed version of the Ksher payment moduleLocate the version identifier in your dependency files or the module's version file. Compare the installed version to the affected range: versions up to and including 1.1.1 are vulnerable.Affected if The installed version is 1.1.1 or any earlier version of the Ksher payment module.
-
Identify sensitive endpoints or functions in the payment moduleReview the application's routing configuration, API definitions, or module files to locate endpoints related to payment operations (e.g., payment creation, refund, transaction status) and administrative functions (e.g., user management, configuration changes).Affected if The module exposes payment-related or administrative endpoints without clear documentation of required authentication.
-
Verify authorization controls on identified endpointsTest each sensitive endpoint by sending requests without providing valid authentication credentials (e.g., no session token, no API key, no JWT). Alternatively, review the source code of these endpoints to check for authorization decorators, permission checks, or role validation logic.Affected if Requests to payment or administrative endpoints succeed without authentication, or no authorization checks are found in the source code.
-
Inspect access control security level configurationSearch configuration files, settings, or environment variables for access control related parameters (e.g., security_level, auth_required, access_control). Compare against recommended secure defaults or documentation.Affected if Access control security levels are set to a permissive state, disabled, or misconfigured.
You are affected if the Ksher payment module version 1.1.1 or earlier is installed AND sensitive endpoints or administrative functions can be accessed without authentication due to missing or incorrect access control configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks on all sensitive endpoints and functions within the payment module, enforce role-based access control (RBAC), and verify that all access control security levels are correctly configured according to the principle of least privilege.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,504.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-56001 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-56001 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data