CVE-2024-56058
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDeserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in denniskravetstns VRPConnector vrpconnector allows Object Injection.This issue affects VRPConnector: from n/a through <= 2.0.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA deserialization vulnerability in VRPConnector allows attackers to inject malicious objects by supplying untrusted serialized data. This object injection can potentially lead to remote code execution if exploitable gadget chains exist in the application or its dependencies.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate VRPConnector componentSearch your codebase, dependencies, or installed packages for the VRPConnector module/libraryAffected if VRPConnector is present in the environment
-
Identify deserialization usageSearch code for deserialization functions (pickle, unserialize, json.loads with object instantiation, YAML unsafe loaders, or custom deserializers) that process data originating from VRPConnectorAffected if VRPConnector uses deserialization methods on incoming data without validation
-
Check data source validationInspect the input handling logic feeding data into VRPConnector to determine if source validation (origin/ownership checks) is performed before deserializationAffected if Data received by VRPConnector is from untrusted or external sources without validation
-
Verify input sanitizationReview VRPConnector code for whitelist validation, type checking, or schema validation applied to deserialized data before object instantiationAffected if No input validation or whitelisting exists on the deserialized data before object creation
-
Review object instantiation patternsSearch for dynamic object creation or class instantiation from deserialized data (such as __reduce__, __setstate__, or similar magic methods)Affected if Deserialized data is used to instantiate arbitrary objects without restriction
Your environment is affected if VRPConnector is present and deserializes data from untrusted sources without input validation or whitelisting, enabling object injection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace unsafe deserialization operations with safer alternatives such as JSON encoding/decoding, or implement strict validation and whitelisting before any deserialization occurs.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-56058 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-56058 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data