Multi Tenant LoadmasterApplication · Progress

CVE-2024-56135

MEDIUM · 6.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-02-05
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 7.1.35.13 / 7.2.54.13 or later.
See remediation →
70/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Input Validation vulnerability of Authenticated User in Progress LoadMaster allows : OS Command Injection. This issue affects:  Product Affected Versions LoadMaster From 7.2.55.0 to 7.2.60.1 (inclusive)    From 7.2.49.0 to 7.2.54.12 (inclusive)    7.2.48.12 and all prior versions ECS All prior versions to 7.2.60.1 (inclusive)

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Improper input validation in Progress LoadMaster allows an authenticated user to inject arbitrary OS commands through unspecified vectors. This command injection vulnerability affects multiple version ranges of the LoadMaster and ECS products, potentially enabling privilege escalation and system compromise.

MitigationUpgrade LoadMaster to a patched version beyond 7.2.60.1. Until patched, strictly limit administrative access to trusted users only and monitor for suspicious command execution.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Multi Tenant LoadmasterApplication
Affected:< 7.1.35.13
LoadmasterOperating system
Affected:<= 7.2.48.12>= 7.2.49.0, < 7.2.54.13>= 7.2.55.0, < 7.2.61.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the LoadMaster product variant
    Determine whether the installed product is 'Progress Multi Tenant LoadMaster' or standard 'Progress LoadMaster' by reviewing the product name displayed in the administrative interface or system documentation
    Affected if The product is Progress Multi Tenant LoadMaster or Progress LoadMaster
  2. Determine the installed LoadMaster version
    Access the LoadMaster administrative interface and navigate to the 'System Configuration' > 'System Information' or 'About' section to view the exact version number and build
    Affected if Unable to retrieve version information from the interface
  3. Compare version against affected ranges for Multi Tenant LoadMaster
    If running Multi Tenant LoadMaster, check if the version is lower than 7.1.35.13
    Affected if Version is < 7.1.35.13 for Multi Tenant LoadMaster
  4. Compare version against affected ranges for LoadMaster
    If running standard LoadMaster, check if version is <= 7.2.48.12 OR between 7.2.49.0 and 7.2.54.12 inclusive OR between 7.2.55.0 and 7.2.60.1 inclusive
    Affected if Version falls into any of these ranges: <= 7.2.48.12, 7.2.49.0-7.2.54.12, or 7.2.55.0-7.2.60.1
  5. Assess administrative access exposure
    Verify whether the LoadMaster administrative web interface (typically ports 443 or 8443) is accessible to untrusted or unauthorized users, or if weak authentication credentials are in use
    Affected if Administrative interface is exposed to untrusted users or uses weak credentials

A user is affected if their LoadMaster version is within the vulnerable ranges AND the administrative interface is accessible to them or to untrusted users, since this is an authenticated command injection vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 7.1.35.13 / 7.2.54.13 / 7.2.61.0 or later
Fixed in 7.1.35.137.2.54.137.2.61.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade LoadMaster to a patched version beyond 7.2.60.1. Until patched, strictly limit administrative access to trusted users only and monitor for suspicious command execution.

Fix this in Multi Tenant Loadmaster Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
24.0 hours of engineering $4,160
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-56135 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-56135 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data