CVE-2024-56141
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMinosoft is an open-source, multi-version Minecraft Java Edition client written in Kotlin. Starting in commit f1ae30e2b046a490026a8413b075685deb795122, the CryptManager encryption routine ( CryptManager.kt ) initializes its AES cipher using an initialization vector (IV) that is set equal to the secret key rather than to a sufficiently random value. Because the IV is not random and is derived directly from the key, the encryption is vulnerable to chosen-ciphertext/chosen-plaintext attacks: an attacker who can submit specific messages for encryption can recover the secret key. This affects all versions supporting Minecraft protocol 1.7 and later. No patched version is available, and no known workarounds are available.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe CryptManager.kt encryption routine uses an initialization vector (IV) that is set equal to the secret key rather than a random value. This violates AES encryption best practices and makes the encryption vulnerable to chosen-ciphertext/chosen-plaintext attacks where an attacker can recover the secret key by submitting specific messages for encryption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate CryptManager.ktSearch the codebase for the file CryptManager.kt, typically found in authentication, crypto, or security-related packagesAffected if The file exists in the codebase - this indicates the affected component is present
-
Find the AES encryption routineOpen CryptManager.kt and locate methods that perform AES encryption (look for Cipher.getInstance, AES, or similar encryption calls)Affected if AES encryption is used in this file - the vulnerable code path exists here
-
Inspect the IV derivationWithin the encryption method, examine how the Initialization Vector (IV) is created - look for variables named 'iv', 'IV', or parameter passing to the Cipher init methodAffected if The code creates or derives an IV - proceed to check how it is set
-
Check if IV equals the secret keyCompare the IV value to the secret key value - look for assignments like 'iv = secretKey', 'iv = key', or similar logic where the key is used directly as the IVAffected if The IV is set equal to or derived directly from the secret key - this is the vulnerable condition
-
Verify random IV is not usedConfirm there is no call to a secure random number generator (SecureRandom, SecureRandom.nextBytes, etc.) for generating the IV, and no IV prepended to the ciphertext outputAffected if No random IV generation is implemented - the vulnerability is confirmed
If the initialization vector in CryptManager.kt is set equal to the secret key rather than being randomly generated, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedReplace the static IV derivation with proper random IV generation using a cryptographically secure random number generator, and ensure the IV is transmitted with the ciphertext per Minecraft protocol specifications.
- No remediation steps are available for this vulnerability.
- The project maintainers have not released a patch or identified any workaround.
- Monitor the project's GitHub repository for future security updates.
- Consider using an alternative Minecraft client until a fix is available.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-56141 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-56141 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data