Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2024-56203

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-12-31
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in gholme4 Wayne Audio Player wayne-audio-player allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Wayne Audio Player: from n/a through <= 1.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Wayne Audio Player allows attackers to trick authenticated users into performing unintended actions, leading to privilege escalation. The lack of anti-CSRF protections enables malicious requests to be forged on behalf of victims with higher privileges.

MitigationImplement anti-CSRF tokens for all state-changing operations and validate Origin/Referer headers. Additionally, configure cookies with SameSite=Strict or SameSite=Lax to prevent cross-site request forgery.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Wayne Audio Player installation and version
    Locate the Wayne Audio Player application in your environment and determine its installed version number. Consult the application's about page, installed packages, or running services to confirm the exact version.
    Affected if The installed version lacks the CVE-2024-56203 patch and is older than the fixed version.
  2. Verify state-changing operations include anti-CSRF tokens
    Inspect the application's source code or network requests when performing actions like user management, settings changes, or privilege modifications. Examine whether each state-changing request includes a unique, unpredictable token that the server validates.
    Affected if State-changing operations can be performed without a valid anti-CSRF token, leaving them vulnerable to forged requests.
  3. Confirm Origin and Referer header validation
    Test the application's behavior by sending requests with mismatched or missing Origin/Referer headers. Check the server-side code or configuration to determine if these headers are validated before processing sensitive operations.
    Affected if The application accepts requests without validating that they originate from the legitimate site.
  4. Inspect cookie SameSite attribute configuration
    Examine the session cookies set by Wayne Audio Player. Use browser developer tools or intercept HTTP responses to check the Set-Cookie headers for the SameSite attribute.
    Affected if Cookies are missing the SameSite=Strict or SameSite=Lax attribute, allowing cross-site cookie transmission.

A user is affected if Wayne Audio Player is running without anti-CSRF token protection on state-changing operations, without Origin/Referer header validation, and without proper SameSite cookie attributes.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement anti-CSRF tokens for all state-changing operations and validate Origin/Referer headers. Additionally, configure cookies with SameSite=Strict or SameSite=Lax to prevent cross-site request forgery.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-56203 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-56203 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data