Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2024-56206

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-12-31
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in krishankakkar gap-hub-user-role gap-hub-user-role allows Authentication Bypass.This issue affects gap-hub-user-role: from n/a through <= 3.4.1.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the gap-hub-user-role WordPress plugin allows attackers to bypass authentication mechanisms. The vulnerability affects all versions through 3.4.1 and enables unauthenticated or unauthorized actions by tricking authenticated users into clicking malicious links.

MitigationImplement anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) on all state-changing operations and validate the authentication workflow to prevent bypass. Update to the latest patched version when available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm plugin installation and version
    Access WordPress admin dashboard, navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins, locate 'gap-hub-user-role' and note the installed version number shown
    Affected if The plugin is installed and the version is 3.4.1 or lower (the summary indicates all versions through 3.4.1 are affected)
  2. Locate plugin files for code inspection
    Access the plugin directory via file manager or FTP at wp-content/plugins/gap-hub-user-role/ and identify the main plugin PHP file containing the role management functionality
    Affected if The plugin directory exists and contains PHP files handling user role changes or permission modifications
  3. Inspect state-changing functions for nonce validation
    Open the main plugin PHP file and search for functions that modify user roles, capabilities, or plugin settings. Examine each function for the presence of 'wp_verify_nonce', 'check_admin_referer', or 'check_ajax_referer' calls at the function entry point
    Affected if State-changing functions (role assignments, capability modifications) lack nonce verification logic
  4. Check form submissions for CSRF token fields
    Examine any HTML forms in the plugin that submit role or permission changes. Verify that each form includes a hidden nonce field (such as wp_create_nonce or a call to wp_nonce_field)
    Affected if Forms handling role or permission changes do not include nonce fields or tokens

You are affected if the gap-hub-user-role plugin is installed with version 3.4.1 or lower AND your environment contains role-changing operations that lack anti-CSRF nonce validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) on all state-changing operations and validate the authentication workflow to prevent bypass. Update to the latest patched version when available.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
17.0 hours of engineering $3,000
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-56206 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-56206 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data