CVE-2024-56232
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alex Volkov WP Nice Loader wp-nice-loader allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WP Nice Loader: from n/a through <= 0.1.0.4.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP Nice Loader plugin allows authenticated users to be tricked into submitting malicious requests that inject Stored XSS payloads. The plugin lacks proper nonce/tokens on state-changing actions, enabling attackers to craft malicious links or forms that execute arbitrary JavaScript in the browsers of users who visit affected pages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify WP Nice Loader plugin is installedIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and search for 'WP Nice Loader' or navigate to Plugins page to confirm the plugin exists and is activeAffected if the plugin is installed and active in WordPress
-
Identify installed plugin versionOn the Plugins page in WordPress admin, click on the plugin name or view details to find the version number displayedAffected if the version number is lower than the version containing CSRF protection (update to latest version recommended)
-
Inspect form actions for nonce verificationView page source of any WP Nice Loader admin settings page or frontend form. Look for 'wp_nonce' or similar nonce field in <form> tags, or check if '_wpnonce' parameter is passed in AJAX requestsAffected if forms and AJAX actions lack nonce/token fields (indicating vulnerability is present)
-
Test state-changing actions via unauthenticated requestAttempt a CSRF PoC: create a malicious HTML form targeting the plugin's admin-post.php or AJAX endpoint with a state-changing action (e.g., save settings). Submit it from a different browser context without the plugin nonceAffected if the action executes successfully without requiring a valid nonce (confirming CSRF vulnerability)
A user is affected if WP Nice Loader is active, the installed version lacks CSRF protection, and the plugin handles state-changing actions without nonce verification.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to the latest version of WP Nice Loader which includes CSRF protection, or implement nonce verification on all form submissions and AJAX actions within the plugin; validate and sanitize all user inputs before storage.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-56232 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-56232 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data