CVE-2024-56244
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in WP Royal Ashe Extra ashe-extra allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Ashe Extra: from n/a through <= 1.2.92.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing Authorization vulnerability in the WP Royal Ashe Extra WordPress theme allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels. The issue affects versions up to and including 1.2.92, where certain functionality lacks proper authentication or capability checks before executing privileged operations. With a CVSS score of 5.4, this is exploitable over the network and can lead to unauthorized administrative actions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Ashe Extra theme versionLocate the theme's style.css file in wp-content/themes/ashe-extra/ and look for the 'Version:' header in the theme comment block, or check the theme version displayed in WordPress admin under Appearance > ThemesAffected if The version listed is 1.2.92 or lower (any version up to and including 1.2.92)
-
Verify WordPress admin access controlsAttempt to access wp-admin or check if the site uses a membership plugin or custom endpoints that might expose theme-related functionalityAffected if Unauthenticated or low-privilege users can reach admin functions or theme-specific AJAX endpoints that should require authentication
-
Inspect theme functions for capability checksReview the theme's functions.php file for any add_action or add_filter hooks related to admin operations, specifically looking for missing current_user_can() or wp_verify_nonce() callsAffected if Hooks handling privileged operations (user management, settings changes, content creation) lack proper capability or nonce verification
You are affected if the Ashe Extra theme version is 1.2.92 or lower AND the theme's admin-related functionality is accessible without proper authentication or authorization checks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Ashe Extra to the latest version (above 1.2.92) which should include proper authorization checks; alternatively, restrict access to the theme's admin functions at the server level until the patch is applied.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-56244 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-56244 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data