CVE-2024-56339
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0 and WebSphere Application Server Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 25.0.0.7 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions caused by a failure to honor security configuration.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0 and Liberty versions 17.0.0.3 through 25.0.0.7 contain a vulnerability where the application fails to honor security configuration settings, allowing a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions. This is a security configuration bypass affecting both the traditional and Liberty deployment models.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 17.0.0.3, <= 25.0.0.7= 9.0.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify WebSphere Application Server versionFor traditional WebSphere: check the version via installation directory or admin console. For Liberty: check the version in thewlp/usr/servers/<serverName>/server.env or using the command 'java -jar wlp-api-archive.jar --version'. The version string typically appears as 9.0.x.x for traditional or 17.0.0.3 through 25.0.0.x for Liberty.Affected if The installed version falls within 17.0.0.3 to 25.0.0.7 inclusive, or equals exactly 9.0.0.0 for traditional WebSphere Application Server.
-
Confirm deployment modelDetermine whether the deployment uses traditional WebSphere Application Server or WebSphere Liberty by checking the installation structure. Traditional uses WebSphere/AppServer directory structure with profiles; Liberty uses wlp/usr/servers/<serverName> structure.Affected if Either deployment model is in use with an affected version.
-
Verify security configuration existsFor traditional WebSphere: navigate to Security > Global Security in the admin console, or check the security.xml file in the config directory. For Liberty: check the server.xml for <feature>security</feature> or <feature>appSecurity</feature> elements and associated authorization settings.Affected if Security features are configured and enabled in the environment.
-
Inspect security configuration settingsReview the configured security settings for potential bypass vectors. For traditional: check security.xml and policy files. For Liberty: review server.xml for security-related elements including authentication, authorization, and role mappings.Affected if Security configuration is present but the environment runs an affected version, indicating potential for configuration bypass.
A user is affected if their WebSphere Application Server (traditional or Liberty) version is 9.0.0.0 or falls within 17.0.0.3 through 25.0.0.7 AND security configuration is enabled in the deployment.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the IBM-provided patch or update to the affected WebSphere versions and review security configuration settings to ensure proper enforcement of security restrictions.
WebSphere Application Server Liberty 25.0.0.8 or later; WebSphere Application Server traditional 9.0.x latest security patch
- 1. Identify the specific WebSphere Application Server edition and version currently installed (Liberty or traditional)
- 2. For WebSphere Application Server Liberty: Upgrade to version 25.0.0.8 or later
- 3. For WebSphere Application Server traditional 9.0.x: Apply the latest available security patch from IBM Fix Central
- 4. After upgrading, verify the security configuration is properly honored by reviewing the server.xml and server-specific configuration files
- 5. Test that security restrictions function as expected after the upgrade
- 6. Monitor IBM Security Bulletins for any further updates
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-56339 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-56339 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data