CVE-2024-56497
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') in Fortinet FortiMail versions 7.2.0 through 7.2.4 and 7.0.0 through 7.0.6 and 6.4.0 through 6.4.7, FortiRecorder versions 7.0.0 and 6.4.0 through 6.4.4 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via the CLI.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOS command injection vulnerability in FortiMail and FortiRecorder CLI allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands by injecting special elements into CLI parameters. Affected versions span FortiMail 7.2.0-7.2.4, 7.0.0-7.0.6, 6.4.0-6.4.7 and FortiRecorder 7.0.0, 6.4.0-6.4.4.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.4.0, < 6.4.8>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.7>= 7.2.0, < 7.2.5>= 6.4.0, < 6.4.5>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Fortinet productDetermine whether FortiMail or FortiRecorder is deployed in your environment. Check the product name via the web UI, CLI, or system documentation.Affected if The product is FortiMail or FortiRecorder and is accessible via CLI.
-
Determine the installed version of FortiMailLog into the FortiMail CLI and run the command to display the firmware version, typically 'get system status' or check the web UI dashboard for the firmware version.Affected if The displayed version falls within 6.4.0 through 6.4.7, 7.0.0 through 7.0.6, or 7.2.0 through 7.2.4.
-
Determine the installed version of FortiRecorderLog into the FortiRecorder CLI and run the command to display the firmware version, typically 'get system status' or check the web UI dashboard for the firmware version.Affected if The displayed version falls within 6.4.0 through 6.4.4 or 7.0.0.
-
Verify CLI access exists for your accountConfirm you have CLI access credentials and can authenticate to the FortiMail or FortiRecorder CLI interface.Affected if You can log into the CLI with an authenticated account, as the vulnerability requires an authenticated attacker.
You are affected if you have FortiMail version 6.4.0-6.4.7, 7.0.0-7.0.6, or 7.2.0-7.2.4, OR FortiRecorder version 6.4.0-6.4.4 or 7.0.0, and the CLI interface is accessible to your user account.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.4.56.4.87.0.2
Apply Fortinet patches: FortiMail 7.2.5/7.0.7/6.4.8 and FortiRecorder 7.0.1/6.4.5 or later. Until patched, limit CLI access to trusted administrators only and monitor for suspicious command execution.
FortiMail: 6.4.8, 7.0.7, or 7.2.5 (depending on current branch); FortiRecorder: 6.4.5 or 7.0.2
- 1. Identify the currently installed FortiMail and/or FortiRecorder version via CLI (get system status) or web UI.
- 2. Determine which upgrade path applies based on your current major.minor version branch.
- 3. Backup the current configuration - for FortiMail use 'execute backup config tftp/ftp/sftp <remote>' or web UI backup; for FortiRecorder use equivalent backup command.
- 4. Download the appropriate fixed firmware from Fortinet support portal: FortiMail 6.4.8, 7.0.7, or 7.2.5; FortiRecorder 6.4.5 or 7.0.2.
- 5. Upload and install the firmware via web UI (System > Firmware) or CLI ('execute firmware upgrade').
- 6. After reboot, verify the version upgrade was successful with 'get system status'.
- 7. Confirm normal operation and test critical email processing/recording functions.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-56497 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-56497 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data