NifiApplication · Apache
CVE-2024-56512
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedApache NiFi 1.10.0 through 2.0.0 are missing fine-grained authorization checking for Parameter Contexts, referenced Controller Services, and referenced Parameter Providers, when creating new Process Groups. Creating a new Process Group can include binding to a Parameter Context, but in cases where the Process Group did not reference any Parameter values, the framework did not check user authorization for the bound Parameter Context. Missing authorization for a bound Parameter Context enabled clients to download non-sensitive Parameter values after creating the Process Group. Creating a new Process Group can also include referencing existing Controller Services or Parameter Providers. The framework did not check user authorization for referenced Controller Services or Parameter Providers, enabling clients to create Process Groups and use these components that were otherwise unauthorized. This vulnerability is limited in scope to authenticated users authorized to create Process Groups. The scope is further limited to deployments with component-based authorization policies. Upgrading to Apache NiFi 2.1.0 is the recommended mitigation, which includes authorization checking for Parameter and Controller Service references on Process Group creation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache NiFi 1.10.0 through 2.0.0 lack authorization checks when creating new Process Groups that bind to Parameter Contexts, reference Controller Services, or reference Parameter Providers. Authenticated users authorized to create Process Groups could access non-sensitive Parameter values and use unauthorized Controller Services/Parameter Providers by exploiting missing authorization validation during Process Group creation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
NifiApplication
>= 1.10.0, < 2.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify NiFi version is within affected rangeCheck the installed Apache NiFi version in the UI (top-right corner) or via the /nifi-api/flow/about endpoint. Compare to affected range >= 1.10.0 and < 2.1.0.Affected if Version is 1.10.0 through 2.0.0 inclusive.
-
Confirm Parameter Contexts existIn NiFi UI, navigate to the Parameter Contexts page (hamburger menu > Controller Settings > Parameter Contexts) or query the /nifi-api/parameter-contexts endpoint via API.Affected if One or more Parameter Contexts are configured in the environment.
-
Confirm Controller Services are configuredIn NiFi UI, navigate to the Controller Services page (hamburger menu > Controller Settings > Controller Services) or query the /nifi-api/controller-services endpoint via API.Affected if One or more Controller Services exist in the environment.
-
Check for user ability to create Process GroupsIn NiFi UI, verify if the authenticated user has permissions to create new Process Groups by dragging a new Process Group onto the canvas or using the API to attempt creation.Affected if User is authenticated and authorized to create Process Groups.
Environment is affected if running NiFi version 1.10.0 through 2.0.0 and has Parameter Contexts, Controller Services, or Parameter Providers configured, with users who can create Process Groups.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.1.0
Upgrade to Apache NiFi 2.1.0 or later, which includes proper authorization checking for Parameter and Controller Service references on Process Group creation.
2.1.0
- Upgrade Apache NiFi to version 2.1.0 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
Fix this in Nifi
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-56512 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-56512 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data