Missing AuthenticationWeakness · CWE-306

CVE-2024-56799

CRITICAL · 10.0 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-12-30
Patch available
A vendor patch is available. No clean upgrade release — apply the published patch.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Simofa is a tool to help automate static website building and deployment. Prior to version 0.2.7, due to a design mistake in the RouteLoader class, some API routes may be publicly accessible when they should require authentication. This vulnerability has been patched in v0.2.7.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Simofa versions prior to 0.2.7 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in the RouteLoader class due to a design flaw. Certain API routes that should require authentication are inadvertently exposed as publicly accessible, allowing unauthenticated attackers to interact with sensitive website build and deployment functionality.

MitigationUpgrade Simofa to version 0.2.7 or later to remediate this authentication bypass vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check Simofa version
    Locate and inspect the Simofa installation to determine the installed version number. Common methods: check package.json, pyproject.toml, or the application's version metadata file.
    Affected if The installed version is earlier than 0.2.7
  2. Identify RouteLoader class usage
    Search the codebase or application configuration for the RouteLoader class to determine if this component is responsible for handling API routes.
    Affected if RouteLoader class is present and handles API route definitions
  3. Review authentication enforcement on routes
    Inspect the RouteLoader configuration and the routes it registers to determine which routes require authentication versus which ones are publicly accessible.
    Affected if Routes handled by RouteLoader that should require authentication are configured as publicly accessible
  4. Test sensitive endpoints without credentials
    Attempt to access the build and deployment related API endpoints (such as site creation, build triggers, or deployment configuration endpoints) without providing authentication credentials.
    Affected if Sensitive build and deployment functionality responds without requiring authentication
  5. Verify authentication is enforced on known sensitive routes
    Compare the actual authentication requirements of RouteLoader-managed routes against the expected security design (which should require auth for build/deployment operations).
    Affected if API routes for build/deployment functions are accessible without authentication tokens

A user is affected if Simofa version is earlier than 0.2.7 AND the RouteLoader class exposes build/deployment API endpoints without requiring authentication.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Patch available Apply the vendor patch
Vendor patch github.com →
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Simofa to version 0.2.7 or later to remediate this authentication bypass vulnerability.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Simofa v0.2.7

  1. 1. Identify the current Simofa installation method (e.g., package manager, Docker, direct binary)
  2. 2. Check the current installed version of Simofa
  3. 3. Upgrade Simofa to version 0.2.7 or later
  4. 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version
  5. 5. Test that authentication is now properly enforced on previously vulnerable API routes

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,390
Get the patch applied

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-56799 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-56799 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data