CVE-2024-56840
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.17.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.17.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.17.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.17.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.17.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.17.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.17.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.17.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.17.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.17.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.17.0). Under certain conditions, IPsec may allow code injection in the affected device. An attacker could leverage this scenario to execute arbitrary code as root user.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA code injection vulnerability exists in the IPsec implementation of multiple RUGGEDCOM ROX devices (MX5000, MX5000RE, RX1400, RX1500, RX1501, RX1510, RX1511, RX1512, RX1524, RX1536, RX5000) running firmware versions prior to V2.17.0. The vulnerability allows an attacker to inject and execute arbitrary code with root privileges on the affected device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.17.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelAccess the device web interface or CLI and check the system information or model number. Common methods: 'show system info' command via SSH/console, or check the device label/console output at boot.Affected if Device model is one of: MX5000, MX5000RE, RX1400, RX1500, RX1501, RX1510, RX1511, RX1512, RX1524, RX1536, RX5000
-
Check firmware versionExecute 'show version' via CLI/SSH, or check the firmware version in the web interface under System > Firmware or About section.Affected if Firmware version is below V2.17.0 (any version string less than 2.17.0, including V2.16.x, V2.15.x, V2.14.x, and earlier)
-
Verify IPsec feature statusCheck IPsec configuration via CLI: 'show ipsec' or navigate to IPsec settings in the web interface under Services > IPsec. Verify if IPsec is enabled or has any active tunnels.Affected if IPsec is enabled or any IPsec tunnels are configured on the device
-
Review IPsec configuration for anomaliesExamine the IPsec configuration file or output for unexpected or unauthorized IPsec profiles, keys, or remote endpoints. Check commands: 'show running-config | include ipsec' or review the ipsec.conf/ipsec.secrets files if accessible.Affected if IPsec configuration contains unexpected profiles, unknown remote endpoints, or configuration values that were not authored by the legitimate administrator
The device is affected if it is a listed RUGGEDCOM ROX model running firmware below V2.17.0 AND has IPsec enabled or configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.17.0
Upgrade RUGGEDCOM ROX firmware to version V2.17.0 or later to remediate the IPsec code injection vulnerability. Prior to upgrading, coordinate a maintenance window and backup configurations as these are critical infrastructure devices.
V2.17.0 or later
- 1. Identify the specific Ruggedcom ROX device model (MX5000, MX5000RE, RX1400, RX1500, RX1501, RX1510, RX1511, RX1512, RX1524, RX1536, or RX5000)
- 2. Check the current firmware version by accessing the device management interface
- 3. Navigate to the Siemens industrial support portal (cert-portal.siemens.com) and locate the firmware download for the identified device model
- 4. Download firmware version 2.17.0 or later for the specific device model
- 5. Before upgrading, backup the current device configuration according to standard procedures
- 6. Upload and install the firmware version 2.17.0 or later via the device's web interface or CLI, following Siemens upgrade instructions
- 7. After upgrade completes, verify the new firmware version is 2.17.0 or later
- 8. Restore the backed-up configuration if needed and verify normal device operation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-56840 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-56840 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data