Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2024-56903

HIGH · 8.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-02-03
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
88/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Geovision GV-ASWeb with the version 6.1.1.0 or less allows attackers to modify POST request method with the GET against critical functionalities, such as account management. This vulnerability is used in chain with CVE-2024-56901 for a successful CSRF attack.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Geovision GV-ASWeb versions 6.1.1.0 and below contains a method-based access control vulnerability allowing attackers to replace POST requests with GET requests against critical account management functionalities. This method tampering bypasses security controls and enables chaining with CVE-2024-56901 to conduct successful CSRF attacks.

MitigationUpgrade Geovision GV-ASWeb to a version newer than 6.1.1.0; ensure consistent authorization and CSRF protection are enforced across both POST and GET methods for account management endpoints.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify GV-ASWeb installation
    Locate the Geovision GV-ASWeb service by checking running web services on the host, typically on ports 80/443, or look for installation directories named 'GV-ASWeb' or 'GeoVision'
    Affected if GV-ASWeb is installed and running as a web service
  2. Check GV-ASWeb version
    Access the web interface login page or check version information in the application (often visible in the footer of the web page or in About/Help sections), or check installed package version if available
    Affected if The installed version is 6.1.1.0 or any version lower than 6.1.1.0
  3. Identify account management endpoints
    Examine the application's URL structure for account-related paths such as /user, /admin, /account, /password, /login, or similar endpoints that handle user creation, modification, or authentication
    Affected if Account management endpoints exist in the application
  4. Test GET method acceptance on POST-only endpoints
    Send a GET request to identified account management endpoints (for example, using curl or browser) and observe if the server processes the request instead of rejecting it with a method-not-allowed error
    Affected if GET requests are accepted and processed by endpoints that should only accept POST requests for account operations

A user is affected if GV-ASWeb version 6.1.1.0 or lower is installed AND account management endpoints accept GET requests in place of POST requests.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Geovision GV-ASWeb to a version newer than 6.1.1.0; ensure consistent authorization and CSRF protection are enforced across both POST and GET methods for account management endpoints.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-56903 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-56903 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data