CVE-2024-5705
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check. This allows attackers to bypass intended access restrictions. (CWE-863) Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Business Analytics Server versions before 10.2.0.0 and 9.3.0.9, including 8.3.x, have modules enabled by default that allow execution of system level processes. When access control checks are incorrectly applied, users can access data or perform actions that they should not be allowed to perform. This can lead to a wide range of problems, including information exposures and denial of service.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHitachi Vantara Pentaho Business Analytics Server versions before 10.2.0.0 and 9.3.0.9 (including 8.3.x) contain default modules that enable execution of system-level processes. The application incorrectly applies or bypasses authorization checks, allowing authenticated users to perform actions and access resources beyond their intended permissions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Pentaho Business Analytics Server versionCheck the version information in the Pentaho server installation, typically found in version manifest files or the pentaho.war/WEB-INF/web.xml version string, or by accessing the /api/system/status endpoint if availableAffected if The installed version is 8.3.x, 9.x before 9.3.0.9, or 10.x before 10.2.0.0
-
Confirm the server is running with default modules enabledInspect the pentaho-solution/system directory for default module configurations that expose system-level process execution capabilitiesAffected if Default modules that enable system-level process execution are present and enabled in the configuration
-
Verify authorization configuration for the affected modulesReview the application-level authorization settings and pentaho-spring-beans.xml or similar security configuration files to determine if authorization checks are properly applied to default modulesAffected if Authorization checks are incorrectly applied, bypassed, or missing for modules that expose system-level process execution
-
Check for unauthorized access by lower-privileged usersReview audit logs or access logs for authenticated users performing actions or accessing resources outside their assigned role permissions, particularly system-level operationsAffected if Authenticated users with limited roles can access resources or execute system-level processes beyond their intended permissions
You are affected if your Pentaho Business Analytics Server version is 8.3.x, 9.x before 9.3.0.9, or 10.x before 10.2.0.0 AND default modules with system-level process execution capabilities are enabled without proper authorization controls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Pentaho Business Analytics Server to version 10.2.0.0 or 9.3.0.9 or later to patch the authorization bypass vulnerability. Review and disable any unnecessary default modules that expose system-level process execution capabilities.
Upgrade to Pentaho Business Analytics Server 10.2.0.0 or later, or 9.3.0.9 or later
- Identify the current Pentaho Business Analytics Server version in use
- Determine which upgrade path is appropriate (10.2.x branch or 9.3.x branch) based on compatibility requirements
- Backup the existing Pentaho installation, including configuration files and databases
- Test the upgrade in a non-production environment to verify functionality
- Apply the upgrade to production environment by installing version 10.2.0.0 or later, or 9.3.0.9 or later
- Verify that the authorization controls are functioning correctly post-upgrade
- Review user roles and permissions to ensure access controls are properly configured
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-5705 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-5705 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data