SQL InjectionWeakness · CWE-89

CVE-2024-57178

MEDIUM · 5.9 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-02-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
64/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An SQL injection vulnerability exists in Stock-Forecaster <=01-04-2020. By sending a specially crafted 'stock-symbol' parameter to the portofolio() endpoint, it is possible to trigger an SQL injection in the application. As a result, the attacker will be able the user data or manipulate the software behavior.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the Stock-Forecaster application (version <=01-04-2020) in the portofolio() endpoint. The vulnerability is specifically in the 'stock-symbol' parameter, which does not properly sanitize user input before using it in an SQL query. An attacker can send specially crafted input to execute arbitrary SQL commands, potentially allowing unauthorized access to user data or modification of application behavior.

MitigationImplement parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database interactions involving user-supplied input, particularly the 'stock-symbol' parameter in the portofolio endpoint. Additionally, apply input validation and output encoding as defense-in-depth measures.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Stock-Forecaster installation
    Locate the Stock-Forecaster application in your environment by checking for application directories, services, or containers named 'Stock-Forecaster' or similar variants.
    Affected if The application is present in your environment.
  2. Determine the installed version
    Check the application's version information by examining metadata files, about pages, or the application binary/config files. Compare the version date to 01-04-2020.
    Affected if The version date is on or before 01-04-2020.
  3. Verify portofolio endpoint existence
    Locate the application source code or configuration and identify if a portofolio() endpoint is defined and accessible.
    Affected if The portofolio endpoint exists and is accessible.
  4. Inspect stock-symbol parameter handling
    Examine the code handling the 'stock-symbol' parameter in the portofolio endpoint to determine if user input is used directly in SQL queries without parameterized queries or input sanitization.
    Affected if The 'stock-symbol' parameter is used in SQL queries without prepared statements or proper sanitization.
  5. Check database interaction layer
    Review the application's database access code to verify whether prepared statements or stored procedures are used for all queries involving the stock-symbol parameter.
    Affected if Parameterized queries (prepared statements) are not implemented for stock-symbol parameter queries.

You are affected if Stock-Forecaster version 01-04-2020 or earlier is installed and the portofolio endpoint with the stock-symbol parameter handles database queries without prepared statements.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database interactions involving user-supplied input, particularly the 'stock-symbol' parameter in the portofolio endpoint. Additionally, apply input validation and output encoding as defense-in-depth measures.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-57178 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-57178 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data