CVE-2024-57373
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in LifestyleStore v1.0 allows a remote attacker to execute unauthorized actions on behalf of an authenticated user, potentially leading to account modifications or data compromise.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in LifestyleStore v1.0 allows a remote attacker to craft malicious requests that will be executed in the context of an authenticated user's session. The application lacks proper anti-CSRF tokens or origin validation on state-changing operations, enabling attackers to perform unauthorized account modifications or data exfiltration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify LifestyleStore installation and versionLocate the application files (commonly in web root directory) and check for version identifiers in source files, configuration files, or the homepage/meta tags. Common paths include index.php, about.php, or README files.Affected if The installed version is LifestyleStore v1.0 or earlier without security patches applied.
-
Inspect forms for anti-CSRF tokensExamine the HTML source of state-changing forms (login, registration, profile update, settings, cart operations, checkout). Look for hidden input fields containing tokens, or tokens in POST request parameters.Affected if State-changing forms lack anti-CSRF token fields (such as 'csrf_token', 'token', or 'csrfmiddlewaretoken') in their HTML markup.
-
Check cookie SameSite attributesLog into the application and inspect Set-Cookie headers or cookie storage in browser developer tools. Verify if cookies have the SameSite attribute set to 'Strict' or 'Lax'.Affected if Session cookies or authentication cookies do not include the SameSite attribute, or it is set to 'None' without Secure flag.
-
Verify Origin/Referer header validationSend a state-changing request (such as profile update) with a mismatched or missing Origin/Referer header using a tool like curl. Check if the server accepts or rejects the request.Affected if The server accepts state-changing requests without validating Origin or Referer headers, allowing cross-origin forged requests.
You are affected if LifestyleStore v1.0 is installed and any of the following are true: state-changing forms lack anti-CSRF tokens, cookies lack SameSite attributes, or the server does not validate Origin/Referer headers on sensitive operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing operations (forms, API endpoints) and validate the Origin/Referer headers server-side, or configure SameSite cookies to mitigate CSRF attacks.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-57373 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-57373 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data